Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hlthe2b

(115,205 posts)
20. So, not the point. Slotkin can go on any program, but she should not give him the attention
Fri Jun 26, 2026, 04:12 PM
Friday

he seeks. He has a history of nutty behavior and no one should put any "created" spin beyond him for attention. You don't know him, apparently, or you would not be chastising ME for my VALID opinion--as shared by others here. When one of ours goes on a RW podcast or Fox or any other media, it is well known what they are all about. That Smith claims to be a Liberal Democrat and "merely a truth-teller wanting to say it like it is about his own party" while saying anything and everything--no matter how untrue-- to create attention to himself is the problem. People watch him because he is outrageous and listen to him because he claims to be what he is not. Hell, if you watch him re: sports, you know he does that continually, but who the hell cares in that context...?

Have your own opinion, but I have every damned right to MINE-- that KNOWS what he is all about! He is all about Stephen A. Smith and no lie, no bastardized story, no bizarre attempt to paint a true Democrat as something they truly are NOT, is beyond him. He's shown that repeatedly. But you be you and adore him. Most of use see through him. Slotkin showed very poor judgement going on his show.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Uggh. Slotkin went on with Stephen A. Smith... hlthe2b Friday #1
We all know she is right. Many here have agreed that Chuckee is a wet noodle. Just about anyone else would do a Exp Friday #8
Which was not my point... clearly never even mentioned that. It was the venue. hlthe2b Friday #10
Doesn't matter if she's on Fox or PBS, she's telling it like it is. She's always had a good message so going on any Exp Friday #13
Again, NOT MY POINT. Clearly you know nothing about Stephen A. Smith. Bye. Done. hlthe2b Friday #14
He's the Af-Am sports guy who gets political. I too think he's an idiot. But that doesn't matter. eom Exp Friday #15
Who gives a rat's bum about Smith? Obviously she got the message out. And she is 100% right. flashman13 Friday #31
Why do all these losers have large platforms? mdbl Saturday #48
I also think that Ken Martin has not been an effective leader for the DNC. Lonestarblue Friday #12
Post removed Post removed Friday #17
Good call Mig popsdenver Friday #30
Just a quick reality check on this: David Hogg wasn't actually kicked out of the DNC. QueerDuck Saturday #47
Not that they actually have abided by that edict in the past. LiberalLovinLug Saturday #54
Nobody is saying party insiders don't have their biases... QueerDuck Saturday #64
They HAVE worked against outsiders. If Sanders is an "outsider" LiberalLovinLug Saturday #66
There's no doubt 2016 had its share of ugly behind-the-scenes insider bias and messy administrative drama... QueerDuck Saturday #67
DCCC is involved in dem Congressional primaries DemocracyForever Saturday #55
I completely get the frustration with national committees getting involved in local primaries... QueerDuck Saturday #63
They're interfering in my CD primary and I didn't vote for their candidate DemocracyForever 6 hrs ago #77
I can't stand him kimbutgar Friday #18
Our elected representatives should not live in bubbles Soul_of_Wit Friday #19
So, not the point. Slotkin can go on any program, but she should not give him the attention hlthe2b Friday #20
I apparently touched a nerve Soul_of_Wit Friday #23
Post removed Post removed Friday #24
This is a gratuitously nasty and arrogant response Akakoji Friday #25
What a "polite" thing to say... hlthe2b Friday #26
It apparently seems to work Akakoji Saturday #46
Sounds serious Torchlight Saturday #68
I share . . . Scubamatt Friday #22
I often have that sentiment on these issues re:inner workings of the party Raven123 Friday #36
Looks like someone was not included dave99 Friday #2
I wholeheartedly agree awesomerwb1 Friday #3
Oh, hey, old buddy. blm Friday #4
blm!!!! DrFunkenstein Friday #6
😘 blm Friday #7
is she volunteering to be the new leadership? msongs Friday #5
She's got a ways to go given her yes vote on the Laken Riley Act. LuvLoogie Friday #9
...not volunteering so much as lobbying to be it. LudwigPastorius Friday #40
It appears so. Akakoji Saturday #69
Slotkin is awesome. She was brave as a brand new Rep in Congress to vote for impeaching TSF. That was a biggie Exp Friday #11
I'm guessing she wants to be majority leader Fiendish Thingy Friday #16
Me too Katcat Friday #21
Looking at the results of the *past decade* not the past 1-2 years, that's a "no shit" conclusion. RockRaven Friday #27
No kidding - these problems within the party should have been addressed at least 16 years ago. NT Midwestern Democrat Saturday #45
They should've been addressed with the DemocracyForever Saturday #56
Sorry To Inform You.... DAngelo136 Friday #28
The entire Congressional Black Caucus hit back on her statement Quiet Em Saturday #50
I agree with you on Jeffries JBTaurus83 Saturday #52
Well said! DemocracyForever Saturday #57
Stephen A. Smith??? Cirsium Friday #29
I agree Skittles Friday #32
Power is hard to give up. Mark.b2 Friday #34
yeah, I know Skittles Friday #39
"Strongly worded letters" didn't cut it Ponietz Friday #33
Chuck and Hakeem beg to differ Charlie Chapulin Friday #35
No comparison between Hakeem and Chuck DemocracyForever Saturday #58
Why is this so fucking hard. Baitball Blogger Friday #37
We don't cater to corporations creeksneakers2 Saturday #44
Totally disagree. Baitball Blogger Saturday #53
Back in the 60s they stopped the war creeksneakers2 Saturday #59
Not interested in revisiting the past. Baitball Blogger Saturday #62
Progressives make us lose. creeksneakers2 Saturday #65
Didn't read anything past the first sentence. Baitball Blogger Saturday #70
Why didn't you read it? creeksneakers2 23 hrs ago #73
It's simple Magoo48 Friday #38
She's right. I don't disagree. lees1975 Friday #41
Please explain how leaders such as Schumer and Jeffries are to blame Akakoji Saturday #42
She wasn't elected to the Senate until 2024 MichMan Saturday #49
She has been in the Federal Government since 2014 Akakoji Saturday #71
Not one Senate Democrat voted against Garland as AG MichMan Yesterday #72
I was extremely vocal at the time. Akakoji 23 hrs ago #74
"Where was she when Biden nominated and tolerated Garland?" MichMan 19 hrs ago #75
Current dem Senate don't fight back strategy is the real problem DemocracyForever Saturday #60
We need to concentrate on stopping Trump creeksneakers2 Saturday #43
Any suggestions for substitution? no_hypocrisy Saturday #51
Senator Chris Van Hollen DemocracyForever Saturday #61
Why does she hate her own Party? JustAnotherGen 17 hrs ago #76
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Slotkin calls for 'new le...»Reply #20