Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

angrychair

(12,548 posts)

8. So is it projecting unity

Reply to QueerDuck (Reply #5)

Sat Jun 27, 2026, 06:29 PM

11 hrs ago

When Democratic leaders attack progressives running for office and Democratic voters, voting in a primary for the candidate they prefer?

In my mind they are the ones trying to divide the Party.

For the record I don't know what Slotkin's motives are but we need leadership that is going to unite the Party and back the candidates that Democratic voters have chosen to represent them.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

LiberalLovinLug luv2fly SunImp SimplyHadEnough

32 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

CBC pushes back on Slotkin's call for 'new leadership' among Democrats [View all] BumRushDaShow 14 hrs ago OP

She is right we need new leadership! bob4460 14 hrs ago #1

The last thing we need now is to go to war with ourselves. creeksneakers2 14 hrs ago #3

Comical at best luv2fly 6 hrs ago #11

What do you think I should call the people creeksneakers2 4 hrs ago #16

What I think you should call engaged voters is irrelevant. luv2fly 3 hrs ago #17

The choice was remarkably unwise. creeksneakers2 3 hrs ago #19

Roughly 33,000 people feel differently n/t luv2fly 3 hrs ago #22

In NYC creeksneakers2 3 hrs ago #24

Its relevant to your complaint about my language. creeksneakers2 3 hrs ago #20

You prefer "progressive loonies," yeah we know n/t luv2fly 3 hrs ago #23

I'm backing off some because creeksneakers2 3 hrs ago #25

No she's Not! Look to herself for her votes for Cha 2 hrs ago #27

We really don't need this shit right now. I don't care, the stakes are too high to be doing the usual bickering Cheezoholic 14 hrs ago #2

Right on! creeksneakers2 14 hrs ago #4

Some people won't lead and they won't get out of the way Ponietz 13 hrs ago #6

Mahalo! We sure as Hellscape Don't! Cha 2 hrs ago #28

Spot on from the CBC!!! Unforced public drama is the absolute last thing we need right now. QueerDuck 13 hrs ago #5

So is it projecting unity angrychair 11 hrs ago #8

There will be time for that later. creeksneakers2 3 hrs ago #21

"Spot on from the CBC!!! Unforced public drama is the absolute last thing we need right now". LiberalLovinLug 7 hrs ago #10

AIPAC, i.e., "Talking dollars" Ponietz 13 hrs ago #7

This is why Democrats lose elections... Escape 7 hrs ago #9

Work together. Makes a ton of sense to me. oasis 6 hrs ago #12

Yes it does.. I'm so disapponted in Sen Slotkin. Cha 2 hrs ago #30

Yes! We've done it befoe so we know the Cha 2 hrs ago #29

I support a Black person Miguelito Loveless 6 hrs ago #13

Rep Crockett won't be there next year. I support Cha 2 hrs ago #31

I agree with the CBC. LudwigPastorius 6 hrs ago #14

Excellent post, Thanks! Cha 2 hrs ago #32

Debate all that Later! ffs w rhe squabbles right now! Win FIRST!!! And. .. electric_blue68 5 hrs ago #15

Corraling Cats dave99 3 hrs ago #18

Hmm... Sen Slotkin should take the CDC's advice! Cha 2 hrs ago #26