Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

luv2fly

(2,773 posts)

17. What I think you should call engaged voters is irrelevant.

Reply to creeksneakers2 (Reply #16)

Sun Jun 28, 2026, 02:05 AM

7 hrs ago

Oh hey, there's one... "engaged voters" exercising their right to vote for the person they choose to best represent them. You know... "Democracy."

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

dave99 RandiFan1290 Ponietz

42 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

CBC pushes back on Slotkin's call for 'new leadership' among Democrats [View all] BumRushDaShow 18 hrs ago OP

She is right we need new leadership! bob4460 17 hrs ago #1

The last thing we need now is to go to war with ourselves. creeksneakers2 17 hrs ago #3

Comical at best luv2fly 10 hrs ago #11

What do you think I should call the people creeksneakers2 7 hrs ago #16

What I think you should call engaged voters is irrelevant. luv2fly 7 hrs ago #17

The choice was remarkably unwise. creeksneakers2 6 hrs ago #19

Roughly 33,000 people feel differently n/t luv2fly 6 hrs ago #22

In NYC creeksneakers2 6 hrs ago #24

They've been calling Dems communist for decades. Cobalt Violet 2 hrs ago #35

She's one of the JustAnotherGen 1 hr ago #40

Its relevant to your complaint about my language. creeksneakers2 6 hrs ago #20

You prefer "progressive loonies," yeah we know n/t luv2fly 6 hrs ago #23

I'm backing off some because creeksneakers2 6 hrs ago #25

No she's Not! Look to herself for her votes for Cha 5 hrs ago #27

We really don't need this shit right now. I don't care, the stakes are too high to be doing the usual bickering Cheezoholic 17 hrs ago #2

Right on! creeksneakers2 17 hrs ago #4

Some people won't lead and they won't get out of the way Ponietz 17 hrs ago #6

You can't lead from the minority. QueerDuck 2 hrs ago #37

Mahalo! We sure as Hellscape Don't! Cha 5 hrs ago #28

Spot on from the CBC!!! Unforced public drama is the absolute last thing we need right now. QueerDuck 17 hrs ago #5

So is it projecting unity angrychair 14 hrs ago #8

There will be time for that later. creeksneakers2 6 hrs ago #21

Completely agree that unity has to go both ways. QueerDuck 2 hrs ago #34

"Spot on from the CBC!!! Unforced public drama is the absolute last thing we need right now". LiberalLovinLug 10 hrs ago #10

Not sure how disciplined campaign strategy qualifies as an oxymoron. QueerDuck 2 hrs ago #36

AIPAC, i.e., "Talking dollars" Ponietz 17 hrs ago #7

This is why Democrats lose elections... Escape 11 hrs ago #9

Work together. Makes a ton of sense to me. oasis 10 hrs ago #12

Yes it does.. I'm so disapponted in Sen Slotkin. Cha 5 hrs ago #30

Yes! We've done it befoe so we know the Cha 5 hrs ago #29

Spot on. Those advocating for "purity tests" would rather rule the ashes of our minority than win a majority. QueerDuck 2 hrs ago #38

I support a Black person Miguelito Loveless 9 hrs ago #13

Rep Crockett won't be there next year. I support Cha 5 hrs ago #31

I agree with the CBC. LudwigPastorius 9 hrs ago #14

Excellent post, Thanks! Cha 5 hrs ago #32

Debate all that Later! ffs w rhe squabbles right now! Win FIRST!!! And. .. electric_blue68 9 hrs ago #15

Corraling Cats dave99 7 hrs ago #18

Hmm... Sen Slotkin should take the CDC's advice! Cha 5 hrs ago #26

The party is going to have this discussion at some point regardless fujiyamasan 3 hrs ago #33

Of course Icanthinkformyself 1 hr ago #39

Slotkin is one of the most JustAnotherGen 1 hr ago #41

To underscore the issue regarding Slotkin BumRushDaShow 30 min ago #42