Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

progree

(13,116 posts)
8. A small change in average temperatures dramatically increases the number of days with extreme temperatures
Sun Jun 28, 2026, 08:59 PM
21 hrs ago


The graph illustrates that a small shift to the right in the average shifts the whole bell curve to the right, and, in this illustration makes hot weather (orange) much more common and extreme hot weather (red) from almost zero probability to considerable probability

If for example, the average daily high in July in some locale is 85 degrees with a 6 degree standard deviation, and normally distributed: [1]

then the number of July days when the high is 103 or above (3 standard deviations above the mean) is 0.1350% of July days.

In Excel, the formula for finding the area under the normal distribution from 103 to infinity with an average of 85 and standard deviation of 6 is:
=1-NORM.DIST(103,85,6,TRUE)
which gives an answer of 0.001350 which is 0.1350% [2]

OK, so no biggie. So what?

Now let's say that due to climate change so far, the average July daily high temperature has shifted by just 2% to the right, from 85 to 86.7

then the number of July days when the high is 103 or above changes to 0.3297% of July days.

That's a 2.44 fold increase (144% increase) in the number of 103+ degree July days for just a 2% increase in the average.

Shift the average 4% to the right, from 85 to 88.434, and you get 0.7598% of July days, a 5.63 fold increase (463% increase) in the number of 103+ degree July days.

=====================================

Repeating the above exercise, but with a less extreme example, finding the number of days with a high of 97 or above (2 standard deviations above the mean)

with an average July daily high of 85 degrees, the number of July days when the high is 97 degrees or above is 2.275% of July days.

Now lets say that due to climate change so far, the average July daily high temperature has shifted by just 2% to the right, from 85 to 86.7 degrees

then the number of July days when the high is 97 or above changes to 4.302% of July days.

That's a 1.89 fold increase (89% increase) in the number of 97+ degree July days for just a 2% increase in the average.

Shift the average 4% to the right, from 85 to 88.434, and you get 7.669% of July days, a 3.37 fold increase (237% increase) in the number of 97+ July degree days.

=====================================

I have another example of an always hot (in summer) place, Phoenix (with a 105 degree average daily high in July), at https://www.democraticunderground.com/1127174632#post3

The same principle applies to other climate change events, e.g. the severity of storms or what have you -- a small shift in the average results in a huge increase in the number of extreme events.


======= FOOTNOTES ===========

[1] Google searches indicate that yes, temperatures are normally distributed.

Picking New York City for example (with an 84 degree average daily high in July)
https://weatherspark.com/m/23912/7/Average-Weather-in-July-in-New-York-City-New-York-United-States

The 10 and 90 percentile bands are shown on the graph, and they are (reading from the graph and using the peak July date) are 77 to 92, which is a band width of 15.

That occurs when X is -1.281552 to +1.281552 standard deviations
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_deviation
See the big table about 2/3 of the way down the article that has this row:
1.281552sigma   80%   20%

Meaning that between minus and plus 1.281552sigma, 80% are within that confidence interval and 20% are outside of it.
(The greek symbol sigma is the symbol for standard deviation. DU replaces it with a "?" so I show "sigma" in the above)

So for a 10 to 90 bandwidth of 15, the standard deviation is 5.85228
(15/2 = 7.5,   7.5/1.281552 = 5.85228)

So, rounding, I used 6 as my standard deviation in the above example.

[2] The TRUE means its the cumulative normal distribution as opposed to the probability density function
The area under the normal distribution curve from minus infinity to 103 (and having an average of 85 and standard deviation of 6) is NORM.DIST(103,85,6,TRUE)
The area from 103 to infinity is
1-NORM.DIST(103,85,6,TRUE)

======================================================

Why your air conditioning bill is about to soar - the energy required rises with the SQUARE of the temperature difference
https://www.democraticunderground.com/1127174891

Recommendations

6 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This message was self-deleted by its author wcmagumba Yesterday #1
My flat on the 7th floor róisín_dubh 18 hrs ago #14
AC in Europe? 🙄 ColoringFool 17 hrs ago #17
some people really don't know Skittles 17 hrs ago #21
Holy Moses. mahina Yesterday #2
Europe is heating up TWICE as fast as other regions SamuelTheThird Yesterday #3
When the AMOC collapses soon chernabogg 23 hrs ago #5
IF it does, then yes SamuelTheThird 23 hrs ago #6
Thankfully I'll be dead róisín_dubh 18 hrs ago #15
Global warming is a hoax. Rush Limbaugh told me so and used scientifical figures to prove it (SARCASM). /nt artemisia1 13 hrs ago #27
There was a brief period in the late 1990's (if I recall) when global temperatures were fairly stable. dedl67 10 hrs ago #29
Well you can't prepare... róisín_dubh 18 hrs ago #16
Kind of not relevant. ColoringFool 17 hrs ago #18
huh? Skittles 17 hrs ago #22
Erm, I live here. róisín_dubh 16 hrs ago #25
And it isn't August yet . . . . no_hypocrisy Yesterday #4
Heat is the number one weather killer. More than all others combined n/t Cheezoholic 23 hrs ago #7
A small change in average temperatures dramatically increases the number of days with extreme temperatures progree 21 hrs ago #8
Figures and stats that mean nothing, really, to the humans in danger now. ColoringFool 17 hrs ago #19
No, but it means a large increase in the number of people suffering now and in the future. And why. progree 16 hrs ago #23
Shouldn't we be doing here what Europe has always been doing? Seeking Serenity 20 hrs ago #9
Tough one BettyBlueDot 19 hrs ago #12
Um.....Whut?? You first. In D.C. On the 4th. ColoringFool 17 hrs ago #20
No, Europe is not eliminating air conditioning, au contraire progree 16 hrs ago #24
Twilight Zone.. We are there BettyBlueDot 19 hrs ago #10
Marta and I went to TZ conventions in 2002 & 2004 Omaha Steve 19 hrs ago #11
Decoy 1957 B&W BettyBlueDot 18 hrs ago #13
DU does remote hosting of photos Omaha Steve 12 hrs ago #28
Crazy to think we were just there last summer fujiyamasan 15 hrs ago #26
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»France records around 1,0...»Reply #8