Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

QueerDuck

(2,235 posts)
12. You make an excellent point about the legal debate, but the trap I'm talking about is purely electoral.
Mon Jun 29, 2026, 06:04 AM
Yesterday

You are entirely right that when it comes to the literal legislative fight, Democrats must directly confront and defeat the dangerous "civil terrorism" narrative. Nobody should accept elevating standard misdemeanors into felonies just because they happen during a protest.

The "trap" I am referring to isn't about what happens inside a state house... instead, it is about how the opposition weaponizes this issue on the campaign trail to independent swing voters.

The opposition wants Democrats to sound like they are minimizing property destruction or accepting blocking highways, because they can turn around and use those soundbites in devastating general election attack ads.

By being crystal clear that we fully support the first amendment but draw a hard line against actual vandalism, we completely disarm their ability to paint us as soft on crime. We can aggressively fight their overreaching "civil terrorism" laws much more effectively if we don't allow them to successfully trap us into looking like we excuse lawlessness.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This was always the plan, and why they constantly accused the Obama and Biden families with bogus smears. mahina Sunday #1
We can reject right-wing traps like this without defending vandalism or property destruction. QueerDuck Sunday #2
I'm not sure who here is defending property destruction as a form of political speech Ilikepurple Sunday #7
You make an excellent point about the legal debate, but the trap I'm talking about is purely electoral. QueerDuck Yesterday #12
PREACH!!!!!!! When wil we LEARN this?? This is going to be an issue in the GA Gov race. Callie1979 Yesterday #13
Yes, I agree that this sort of clarity has great political value. Ilikepurple 23 hrs ago #17
When we have mass unemployment unrest, they will want 'kill on sight' power SamuelTheThird Sunday #3
well we know where the owners live too dave99 Sunday #5
These Laws have existed for DECADES already in EVERY locality ! Vandalism - done disorderly conduct - done dave99 Sunday #4
HATE headlines like this. Just write "Manhattan Institute!" Grins Sunday #6
OR............................................ AZ8theist Yesterday #11
I'm wondering if they would apply this to Jan. 6th tourists? n/t aggiesal Sunday #8
Of course not. warmfeet Sunday #9
NOTHING applies to them. Callie1979 Yesterday #14
A front-line supporter of Trump's efforts to establish a fascist state J_William_Ryan Sunday #10
""This is aimed at trying to silence public demonstrations, public assemblies..." OldBaldy1701E Yesterday #15
I've seen a lot of CIVIL TERRORISM caught on video Martin Eden Yesterday #16
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Conservative think tank b...»Reply #12