Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Cheezoholic

(4,170 posts)

6. Not to shocking to me. As the article states, the language in the Constitution on this issue is clear and unambiguous

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Mon Jun 29, 2026, 10:28 AM

Monday

Its the post marked by election day part that would be hard for the court to ignore. Ruling against this would open the door for a calamity of cases against states rights. That's why I think it's hard to ignore states rights here considering how plain the language of the law is, even with this court IMO.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

MarineCombatEngineer republianmushroom

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court endorses post-Election Day mail-in ballot counting ahead of midterms [View all] BumRushDaShow Monday OP

We won one there! creeksneakers2 Monday #1

I am shocked by this one Bettie Monday #2

I am shocked! sheshe2 Monday #3

5-4 - Roberts and Barrett joined the liberals for this (nt) muriel_volestrangler Monday #4

Whoo Hoo!! MarineCombatEngineer Monday #5

Not to shocking to me. As the article states, the language in the Constitution on this issue is clear and unambiguous Cheezoholic Monday #6

Deadline Legal Blog-Supreme Court sides 5-4 against Republicans to uphold mail-in ballot grace periods LetMyPeopleVote Monday #7

Roberts has a pattern of doing things like this: YodaMom2 Monday #8