Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(184,160 posts)
11. Sotomayor blasts court's ruling allowing Trump to fire agency heads
Mon Jun 29, 2026, 12:05 PM
6 hrs ago

With palpable anger, the Obama appointee read for 20 minutes from her sharp dissent, calling the decision one that “reshapes the structure of government.

Sotomayor blasts court’s ruling allowing Trump to fire agency heads

With palpable anger, the Obama appointee read for 20 minutes from her sharp dissent, calling the decision one that “reshapes the structure of government.”

Julianne McShane (@juliannemcshane.bsky.social) 2026-06-29T15:44:38.222Z

https://www.ms.now/news/sonia-sotomayor-fiery-dissent-slaughter-case

Justice Sonia Sotomayor delivered a fiery dissent Monday in the Supreme Court’s decision backing President Donald Trump’s power to fire members of independent federal agencies, describing the Republican-appointed majority’s ruling as one that cuts away at the Constitution.

Inside the chambers, Sotomayor spent nearly 20 minutes reading from the bench her dissenting opinion in Trump v. Slaughter — an uncommon practice for a dissenting justice.

In a defiant tone, and with palpable anger, she described the decision held as one that “reshapes the structure of government in a fundamental way,” by giving the president “a power unknown even to the English Crown against which the Founders revolted, elevating him above his once-coequal branches.”

The decision allowing Trump to fire Rebecca Slaughter, a Democratic member of the Federal Trade Commission, without cause upends a 1935 precedent that had protected the independence of agencies.

In doing so, Sotomayor said, the court is transforming the president’s “duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed into a license to act in defiance of those very laws.”

Alito has been getting pissed at Justice Sotomayor's dissents. It will be interesting to see how Alito reacts

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It's a huge win that Lisa Cook is protected. SamuelAdams 7 hrs ago #1
"The Federal Reserve is different from other independent agencies..." sop 7 hrs ago #2
Three losses for Trump this morning and COUNTING...... Bengus81 7 hrs ago #3
Live Updates: Supreme Court Expands Presidential Power Over Regulators, but Blocks Fed Firing for Now cliffside 7 hrs ago #4
A lot of SCOTUS decisions are against injunctions. Igel 6 hrs ago #10
The next Democratic president must fire all Trump regulators on day one dalton99a 7 hrs ago #5
I though the same thing. NCDem47 7 hrs ago #8
The next Democratic president should clean house, but he/she will probably try to be conciliatory and reasonable. sop 2 hrs ago #17
"Independent" agencies? WestMichRad 7 hrs ago #6
Those 6 Republican REALLY HATE the United States. dave99 7 hrs ago #7
So the only way Congress can control this now is to not fund these agencies? Works right into Project 2025 n/t Cheezoholic 7 hrs ago #9
Sotomayor blasts court's ruling allowing Trump to fire agency heads LetMyPeopleVote 6 hrs ago #11
Sounds like they want to bring back the "Spoils System" Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin 6 hrs ago #12
Well, on the bright side Karma13612 5 hrs ago #13
Not clear how this decision impacts the Postal Service. onenote 4 hrs ago #14
The Not-So-Supreme court's fascist 6 are disgusting mdbl 3 hrs ago #15
So they basically put the kibosh on any independent agency? D. Spaulding 3 hrs ago #16
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court rules Trump...»Reply #11