Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

lostincalifornia

(5,634 posts)

21. Who would have thought what was at stake in 2000, 2016, and 2024 that it was the SUPREME COURT?

Reply to Dulcinea (Original post)

Thu Apr 16, 2026, 07:29 PM

Apr 16

It was the jackasses who repeatedly refused to vote for the Democratic candidate because it didn't match their "ideal vision".

They are beneath contempt, and those who went out of their way encouraging people not to vote for Hillary in 20216 should never be given seat at the table again.

Our Democracy is on its last legs because some people were careless enough to listen to those FOOLS!!!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

22 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump leans in on a major 2026 issue: possibly replacing Justices Alito and Thomas [View all] Dulcinea Apr 16 OP

Do they need 60 votes in the Senate to confirm? Bluestocking Apr 16 #1

No JBTaurus83 Apr 16 #2

51. If either Justice died after January 2026, no_hypocrisy Apr 16 #5

Epstein. marble falls Apr 16 #3

Democratic Senate Candidates displacedvermoter Apr 16 #4

It won't matter if he replaces them with Cannon and Barron Fiendish Thingy Apr 16 #6

A worse person than those two pwb Apr 16 #7

That was my reaction after seeing the headline Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 16 #10

They found Kavanaugh. eggplant Apr 16 #11

Probably Cannon and Bondi..... Bettie Apr 17 #22

he doesn't need worse, just younger Oliver Bolliver Butt Apr 16 #15

- Lemon Lyman Apr 16 #20

If ever there was a reason to change how SCOTUS is organized... TheWaywardTarheel Apr 16 #8

Ideal outcome... homegirl Apr 16 #9

I'd really like to share that article, but it's behind a paywall. Sogo Apr 16 #12

We need a super majority! BidenRocks Apr 16 #13

He just wants to say he appointed to new justices jgmiller Apr 16 #14

"Piggy couched his comments MorbidButterflyTat Apr 16 #16

I SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO look forward to having somebody else sounding off calimary Apr 16 #17

He may continue to sound off for a while, but I don't think he'll be able to do it for long. ShazzieB Apr 16 #19

No, jackhole, YOU won't "have somebody for 40 years." ShazzieB Apr 16 #18

Who would have thought what was at stake in 2000, 2016, and 2024 that it was the SUPREME COURT? lostincalifornia Apr 16 #21