Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

lostincalifornia

(5,429 posts)

21. Who would have thought what was at stake in 2000, 2016, and 2024 that it was the SUPREME COURT?

Reply to Dulcinea (Original post)

Thu Apr 16, 2026, 07:29 PM

1 hr ago

It was the jackasses who repeatedly refused to vote for the Democratic candidate because it didn't match their "ideal vision".

They are beneath contempt, and those who went out of their way encouraging people not to vote for Hillary in 20216 should never be given seat at the table again.

Our Democracy is on its last legs because some people were careless enough to listen to those FOOLS!!!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump leans in on a major 2026 issue: possibly replacing Justices Alito and Thomas [View all] Dulcinea 12 hrs ago OP

Do they need 60 votes in the Senate to confirm? Bluestocking 12 hrs ago #1

No JBTaurus83 11 hrs ago #2

51. If either Justice died after January 2026, no_hypocrisy 11 hrs ago #5

Epstein. marble falls 11 hrs ago #3

Democratic Senate Candidates displacedvermoter 11 hrs ago #4

It won't matter if he replaces them with Cannon and Barron Fiendish Thingy 11 hrs ago #6

A worse person than those two pwb 11 hrs ago #7

That was my reaction after seeing the headline Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin 8 hrs ago #10

They found Kavanaugh. eggplant 7 hrs ago #11

he doesn't need worse, just younger Oliver Bolliver Butt 7 hrs ago #15

- Lemon Lyman 1 hr ago #20

If ever there was a reason to change how SCOTUS is organized... TheWaywardTarheel 9 hrs ago #8

Ideal outcome... homegirl 9 hrs ago #9

I'd really like to share that article, but it's behind a paywall. Sogo 7 hrs ago #12

We need a super majority! BidenRocks 7 hrs ago #13

He just wants to say he appointed to new justices jgmiller 7 hrs ago #14

"Piggy couched his comments MorbidButterflyTat 6 hrs ago #16

I SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO look forward to having somebody else sounding off calimary 5 hrs ago #17

He may continue to sound off for a while, but I don't think he'll be able to do it for long. ShazzieB 5 hrs ago #19

No, jackhole, YOU won't "have somebody for 40 years." ShazzieB 5 hrs ago #18

Who would have thought what was at stake in 2000, 2016, and 2024 that it was the SUPREME COURT? lostincalifornia 1 hr ago #21