Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eppur_se_muova

(39,741 posts)
15. One baseball myth that just won't die is that the "World Series" was named for the New York World newspaper ...
Wed Jul 16, 2025, 11:33 PM
Jul 16
Origin of the Name "World Series"

One baseball myth that just won't die is that the "World Series" was named for the New York World newspaper, which supposedly sponsored the earliest contests. It didn't, and it wasn't.

In fact, the postseason series between the AL and NL champs was originally known as the "Championship of the World" or "World's Championship Series." That was shortened through usage to "World's Series" and finally to "World Series."

This usage can be traced through the annual baseball guides. Spalding's Base Ball Guide for 1887 reported the results of the 1886 postseason series between Chicago, champions of the National League, and St. Louis, champions of the American Association, under the heading "The World's Championship." As the editor noted, the two leagues "both entitle their championship contests each season as those for the base ball championship of the United States," so a more grandiose name was required to describe the postseason showdown between the two "champions of the United States."

But the Spalding Guide -- which, after all, was published by one of the world's largest sporting goods companies, with a vested interest in bringing baseball to other lands -- had grander ambitions. By 1890, the Spalding Guide was explaining that "[t]he base ball championship of the United States necessarily includes that of the entire world, though the time will come when Australia will step in as a rival, and after that country will come Great Britain; but all that is for the future."

This didn't happen, but the name "World's Championship Series" stuck. Reporting on the first modern postseason series, the Red Sox-Pirates battle of 1903, the 1904 Reach Guide called it the "World's Championship Series." By 1912, Reach's headline spoke of the "World's Series," while editor Francis Richter's text still referred to the "World's Championship Series." The Reach Guide switched from "World's Series" to "World Series" in 1931, retaining the modern usage through its merger with the Spalding Guide and through its final issue in 1941. The separately-edited Spalding Guide used "World's Series" through 1916, switching to "World Series" in the 1917 edition.

The Spalding-Reach Guide was replaced as Major League Baseball's semi-official annual by the Sporting News Guide, first published in 1942. The Sporting News Guide used "World's Series" from 1942 through 1963, changing to "World Series" in the 1964 edition.

Moreover, the New York World never claimed any connection with postseason baseball. The World was a tabloid much given to flamboyant self-promotion. If it had been involved in any way with sponsoring a championship series, the fact would have been emblazoned across its sports pages for months. I reviewed every issue of the World for the months leading up to the 1903 and 1905 World's Championship Series -- there's not a word suggesting any link between the paper and the series.

http://roadsidephotos.sabr.org/baseball/name.htm

SABR is the Society for American Baseball Research

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I figure just marketing in order to match the "World Cup" in soccer.... walkingman Jul 16 #1
Thank you walkingman, I will do. My Pirates aren't going anywhere, I'm afraid. debm55 Jul 16 #4
When the Series was first played in 1903 Oeditpus Rex Jul 16 #2
Why don't they make it real World Series and make it open to other countries. Thank you.for the information. Oeditpus debm55 Jul 16 #3
I guess Oeditpus Rex Jul 16 #7
Thank you very much, Oeditpus Rex. I see your point. debm55 Jul 16 #8
this. AllaN01Bear Jul 16 #9
In 1743, a children's book was published in England Oeditpus Rex Jul 16 #12
Thank you for the information. Oeditpus Rex. debm55 Jul 17 #17
Thank you very much AllNOIBear. How did getting the crown go??? debm55 Jul 16 #13
...not to mention the arrogance of them calling it the 'Miss Universe' pageant when... LudwigPastorius Jul 16 #5
HAHAHHAHAHha. Thank you LudwigPastoius. debm55 Jul 16 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author AllaN01Bear Jul 16 #10
This message was self-deleted by its author AllaN01Bear Jul 16 #11
This message was self-deleted by its author eppur_se_muova Jul 16 #14
One baseball myth that just won't die is that the "World Series" was named for the New York World newspaper ... eppur_se_muova Jul 16 #15
Thank you for sharing , eppur_se_muova. thank you for sharing the information. debm55 Jul 17 #16
The answer is arrogance. For Americans, there is no "world" outside the US. malthaussen Jul 18 #18
That was my thought too. Thank you, Mal. debm55 Jul 18 #19
Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»Something to ponder, Why ...»Reply #15