Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The DU Lounge
In reply to the discussion: 5 Reasons Why Shakespeare Should Not Be Required in Schools [View all]appmanga
(1,517 posts)88. The fact they may not understand it is the reason we have schools...
...and I don't get why we should go down a path where education is somehow supposed to be bereft of challenge, and people should only take in what they would natively understand. That's the concept that gives us flat-Earthers and fundamentalists. The idea of education is to go beyond what we don't immediately understand, that we can get beyond the denseness of a style of writing in order not just to understand what the writer is saying, but that there may be better ways of saying it, or maybe not. And that's just one way to approach that stanza.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
108 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Shakespeare's themes are timeless. Unless this is an April Fool's prank, I find it ridiculous.
hlthe2b
Apr 1
#1
What total BS. Just like all but claiming the UK has no tanks but only royal horses
hlthe2b
Apr 1
#7
Once again, you have NOT read (or at least comprehended) my posts that do counter you.
hlthe2b
Apr 2
#39
I note your earlier post is asserting UK has 501 royal horses & only 334 tanks. (eyeroll)
hlthe2b
Apr 1
#5
Nix on "Streetcar". Never understood why that piece of crap is considered art.
eppur_se_muova
Apr 1
#6
Exactly! Throw some deeply damaged, disturbed individuals together to see how, and how much, they can damage each other.
eppur_se_muova
Apr 3
#97
I think Williams' message was exactly that: the brutish, insensitive people exploit the sensitive, delicate ones.
CTyankee
Apr 6
#108
When I was in seventh grade, I read through all of the Shakespeare comedies. I loved them.
Walleye
Apr 1
#10
All the titles from 6, except the angry men were studied between jr high and high school
questionseverything
Apr 3
#78
I love the King James Version of the Bible. My father's Masonic Bible is a treasure I handed down to my son.
CTyankee
Apr 2
#42
Love Shakespeare. Always have, since first reading his plays in 6th grade. Years ago, two
highplainsdem
Apr 1
#17
We can't know what the author intended because they were deceased when The Tempest
GreatGazoo
Apr 3
#63
I've always loved Shakespeare. I took Shakespeare in my college English Dept. and acted in Twelfth Night...
wcmagumba
Apr 2
#53
I will take Shakespeare any day over some of the other dreck we read in high school.
3catwoman3
Apr 2
#54
I found many of the 19th century English novels in secondary school canon boring
Ilikepurple
Apr 2
#57
When I learned that Dickens had been paid by the word, it explained a lot about why Great Expectations...
3catwoman3
Apr 5
#102
I had a hard time getting into A Tale of Two Cities and haven't revisited it as I have other 19th century novels.
Ilikepurple
Apr 3
#92
None of the plays you listed in number one would be here were it not for Shakespeare.
OldBaldy1701E
Apr 2
#59