Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Colorado

AnrothElf

(923 posts)

3. I'm not ready to jump to those conclusions yet.

Reply to SWBTATTReg (Reply #1)

Wed Jan 31, 2024, 04:23 AM

Jan 2024

This could be a good-faith attempt to do just what the motion suggests. It's possible the SoS is even surprised by unexpected opposition.

The pushback itself is maybe more about keeping focus on CO Supreme Court's decision on appeal, rather than the original trial where the SoS's decision was material.

They're trying to keep this a matter of law, rather than a matter of fact. Or so I guess...

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Colorado Voters Behind Kicking Trump Off Ballot Urge Supreme Court to Deny Secretary of State's Request for 'Prominent R [View all] Nittersing Jan 2024 OP

What could be more prominent than the actual voters on the ground speaking up? Trying to shoehorn in and SWBTATTReg Jan 2024 #1

I'm not ready to jump to those conclusions yet. AnrothElf Jan 2024 #3

I don't know how to view this as the Sec'y of State is for... brush Jan 2024 #2