Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProfessorGAC

(74,147 posts)
6. Agreed!
Thu Apr 22, 2021, 03:44 PM
Apr 2021

I investigated an incident of damage to coalescing filters (and instrumentation) in an environmental control system.
The raw material, (using HF as an alkylation catalyst) was not cleaned of organofluorides.
So, in the process under review, the extremely high electronegativity & extreme temperatures liberated HF into the diluent air.
The damage to the system was immense. After only 2 days of production.
The spun glass in the coalescing filters turned to mush.
Fortunately, after only 2 days and a lot of HF consumed by the damaged process, our numbers said worker exposure was very, very low, if any. Fortunately.
Nothing to be careless with.
BTW: the claim against the supplier was for $4 million, in around 1990. Expensive mistake by the supplier.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Illinois»Trump appointees obstruct...»Reply #6