Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

stopdiggin

(14,944 posts)
1. have to kind of agree
Sat Dec 6, 2025, 02:20 AM
Dec 6

with what I see in the ruling here. If ballots are in error (for whatever reason) - there should be opportunity for either correction or adjudication. But 'fairness' doesn't not encompass the counting of errant ballots or voting.

Having said that - how much variance (in final result) is there between the SoS guidance and judges ruling?

i.e., is the SoS saying that ballots without the proper stubs should accounted valid - regardless of error? Or only as preliminary to rectifications and/or adjudication?

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Michigan»Judge rejects MI election...»Reply #1