Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Vogon_Glory

(9,746 posts)
7. Not all of them
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 11:20 AM
Mar 23

I don’t doubt or deny that most of the Anglo combatants at the Alamo were either slave-holders or wanna-be slave-owners, but I expect that more than a few were people who’d been trying to get a fresh start or, like the few Tejanos who also died at the Alamo, were leery of Santa Ana and his efforts to create a centralized authoritarian state. That part should also be remembered.

I am not trying to white-wash the racist behavior and attitudes of many of the Texan combatants here. But I’m not about to remain silent about the character and behavior of Antonio Lopez de Santa Ana and his political actions and his behavior in the field and after the battle. Such regimes should be opposed.

If you don’t think that the Texans who died at the Alamo deserve that amount of respect, I can’t stop you. But I believe that the rebels massacred in Zacatecas and in the Yucatán do.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Texas»Alamo was/is an Anglo Bul...»Reply #7