Australia

Response to marble falls (Reply #59)

Name removed Message auto-removed

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

61 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Australia wrestles with Port of Darwin, under Chinese ownership [View all] TexasTowelie May 2021 OP

worth 23.2 million to get rid of the foreign control of their own city nt msongs May 2021 #1

+1 2naSalit May 2021 #2

I agree. Mickju May 2021 #3

Hi TexasTowelie. More than happy to pay more tax if I need to... Violet_Crumble May 2021 #4

Hello Violet. TexasTowelie Jun 2021 #6

Did you hear about this? Radical Ant Jun 2021 #5

No, I haven't read about that report. TexasTowelie Jun 2021 #7

Tensions Radical Ant Jun 2021 #8

Seriously. The US has nuclear weapons in Australia the Australians don't want? ... marble falls Jun 2021 #9

Post removed Post removed Jun 2021 #10

Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2021 #11

And I don't wnat either fucking one. Screw nuclear weapons, the Chinese infrastructure already is. marble falls Jun 2021 #12

Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2021 #13

If the choice is between US or Australian and Chinese infrastructure, screw China ... marble falls Jun 2021 #14

Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2021 #15

Sounds to me like you have a knee jerk response. Explain how a preference for bldgs that ... marble falls Jun 2021 #16

Me thinks DJ TEXXAS Jun 2021 #17

I'm not sure I understand. marble falls Jun 2021 #18

Like for not like DJ TEXXAS Jun 2021 #19

Really. You can't see US nuclear weapons in Australia, either, assuming there any ... marble falls Jun 2021 #20

The masses did not invite DJ TEXXAS Jun 2021 #21

What do you mean, that if there are US nuclear weapons in Australia, Australia didn't invite ... marble falls Jun 2021 #22

Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2021 #23

I think the only US military forces in Australia is a Navy communications station TomSlick Jun 2021 #24

Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2021 #26

Your position is not supported by the evidence. TomSlick Jun 2021 #29

Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2021 #33

I can accept that you are a socialist but that doesn't answer my question. TomSlick Jun 2021 #35

The representational government of Australia invited whatever US presence to Australia ... marble falls Jun 2021 #30

What in the world does that even mean? If every country got their shorts bunched everytime .... marble falls Jun 2021 #25

Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2021 #27

No poop. So why are you hysterical about an invited US presence in Australia??? marble falls Jun 2021 #28

Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2021 #31

What's a "bombs weapon?" TomSlick Jun 2021 #32

Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2021 #34

"Bombs weapons" is not a thing for English speakers. TomSlick Jun 2021 #38

Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2021 #40

It's all about your mischaracterization of the Australian/US allience and your assumtion of US ... marble falls Jun 2021 #42

Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2021 #48

Yes, I am confident you do not understand. TomSlick Jun 2021 #49

That's a pile of convolution right there ... marble falls Jun 2021 #36

Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2021 #37

Why does China have nuclear weapons? Why is China trying to move international borders ... marble falls Jun 2021 #39

Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2021 #41

Is Australia in the South China Sea? marble falls Jun 2021 #43

Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2021 #44

If there's no threat boyo, why are you feeling threatened by your quite possibly imaginary ... marble falls Jun 2021 #45

Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2021 #47

Nuclear weapons Sunny Jim Jul 2021 #50

That's a whole new issue. Re-aligned your argument? marble falls Jul 2021 #51

Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2021 #52

Have you explained that to the Chinese gov't yet? What does this have to do with your ... marble falls Jul 2021 #53

Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2021 #54

How would Marx explain the dicotomy of "dead labor" and the US standard of living? ... marble falls Jul 2021 #55

Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2021 #56

Absolutely adds to the bottom line. You're confusing GNP with the consumer market. And ... marble falls Jul 2021 #57

Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2021 #58

And you're strongly wrong. Maybe in China people donate materials and labor for free ... marble falls Jul 2021 #59

Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2021 #60

But I am willing to continue to try to educate you. Don't be so hard on your self! marble falls Jul 2021 #61

Is There A Two Drink Minimum For This Show? Jim G. Jun 2021 #46