Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Computer Help and Support

dutch777

(4,628 posts)

1. I am sure that is true. Wouldn't want to set up a liability framework that makes AI agents $$ responsible for damages

Reply to Passages (Original post)

Sat May 17, 2025, 09:29 AM

May 17

or anything that may want they to think about what they do and how they do it. Kind of like having surgery and not taking pain meds recommended until pain is so bad and then trying to catch up on that. Bad idea! Lots of pain and then side effects of too much pain meds.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Passages

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

FTC's Ferguson tells lawmakers agency won't regulate AI until after problems occur [View all] Passages May 17 OP

I am sure that is true. Wouldn't want to set up a liability framework that makes AI agents $$ responsible for damages dutch777 May 17 #1

"We address problems as they arise." Complete BS. There are already a multitude of problems with AI, highplainsdem May 17 #2

They damn well know it too. Passages May 17 #3