Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Barack Obama

In reply to the discussion: Pardon my disinclination. [View all]

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
9. Sen. Collins is a habitual liar on national security matters
Tue Jun 11, 2013, 03:06 PM
Jun 2013

She openly lied about Benghazi



http://www.mediaite.com/tv/impeachy-not-so-keen-sen-susan-collins-also-doesnt-see-impeachment-over-benghazi/

“If that is so,” Crowley said, “is it not a cover-up on a scale of — I mean, why do you think they would do this? Do you think it was to help the President get reelected?”

“I believe that because we were in the midst of the final weeks of a very contentious presidential re-election campaign, that one of the themes of this administration was that Libya was a success, that the military intervention had produced a stable pro-United States country that was moving toward democracy, and that al Qaeda was on the run. And what happened in Benghazi proved that neither of those narratives was accurate.”

Whatever the reasons for the revisions to the talking points, however, Collins’ claim is undercut by the fact that the President repeatedly referred to the attacks as an “act of terror” in the days following the attacks, and Amb. Susan Rice talked, specifically about al Qaeda and Ansar al Sharia, during her Sunday news show interviews.




I am basically in agreement with your position that we cannot make policy based on the assumption that Obama/Biden are good guys. That is why it is important to defeat Republicans, get control of Congress and elect as many Bernie Sanders/Elizabeth Warren types as we can. I don't see any other real solution.

President Eisenhower gave an impassioned speech before he left office about the control of the Military/Industrial alliance and the waste that it creates. He did not however spend his capital while in office trying to challenge it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Pardon my disinclination. [View all] madamesilverspurs Jun 2013 OP
k&r graham4anything Jun 2013 #1
Well said. Aristus Jun 2013 #2
Obama isn't king. He will leave, but his spying apparatus will be here. dkf Jun 2013 #3
The national security apparatus question existed before and will exit after this President grantcart Jun 2013 #5
Ask Sen. Susan Collins how much oversight they've been providing. dkf Jun 2013 #8
Sen. Collins is a habitual liar on national security matters grantcart Jun 2013 #9
And besides ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2013 #18
Yes, but there was Nixon, Reagan and Bush LeftInTX Jun 2013 #13
The technology has only now caught up to the data. The types of surveillance achievable here dkf Jun 2013 #14
It's not his apparatus: it's the apparatus that he inherited. If you have ideas struggle4progress Jun 2013 #15
Jesus. Where were you between 2001 and 2008? This is BUSH/CHENEY's legacy. Hekate Jun 2013 #17
You should go underground and get off the internet if you are so concerned Kolesar Jun 2013 #19
Your points are well taken. grantcart Jun 2013 #4
Thanks, grantcart. madamesilverspurs Jun 2013 #6
Perhaps using "setting one's hair on fire" as pejorative may not be helpful in bridging chasms grantcart Jun 2013 #7
LOL. ucrdem Jun 2013 #10
Well said, madame.. Cha Jun 2013 #11
It seems to me that a lot of those whiners would have been happier than hell if Romney would've won Major Hogwash Jun 2013 #12
Oh yeah, they'd find some Cha Jun 2013 #16
I couldn't agree more Andy823 Jun 2013 #20
It's a lot more fun to set fire to GOP hair(balls). IrishAyes Jun 2013 #21
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Barack Obama»Pardon my disinclination.»Reply #9