Welcome to DU!
    The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
    Join the community:
    Create a free account
    Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
    Become a Star Member
    Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
    All Forums
        Issue Forums
        Culture Forums
        Alliance Forums
        Region Forums
        Support Forums
        Help & Search
    
Men's Group
In reply to the discussion: Well, another cowardly attack... [View all]Major Nikon
(36,925 posts)6. I'm just not really into word policing
        Categorizing a term or word as offensive if it offends everyone is one standard.  Categorizing a term or word as offensive if it offends one person is another standard.  At some point reasonableness has to be inserted, unless we want to keep a sticky list of words we can't use.  There are some on DU who claim the word "hysterical" is sexist due to its Greek and Latin origins.  Would you discontinue using that word on that basis?
The problem is the perpetually offended will find reason to be offended regardless of what words you use and they certainly have no problems employing strawman or other fallacies to do so, and those are inevitably the same ones who mindlessly argue that "prick" isn't sexist while "pussy" is. 

Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
  Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
						
							45 replies
							
								
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
                    
        
        Wait, what's wrong with shrill? And hasn't "hysteria" developed well beyond it's origins by now?
        kjones
        Dec 2014
        #14
      
        
        Getting the menu mixed up with the meal, as it were. Confusing the map with the territory.
        Veilex
        Dec 2014
        #28
      
        
        "Demands for a double standard aren't reasonable" - But that is not what this is.
        Veilex
        Dec 2014
        #32
      
        
        I was responding to your post, but perhaps we both misunderstood each other
        Major Nikon
        Dec 2014
        #36
      
        
        "I do agree with you in that how something is said and the context in which it is conveyed..."
        kjones
        Dec 2014
        #34