"rape and PIV* are almost the same thing", Part II. Welcome to Bizarro World.

[4th law of robotics]

33. From the comments:

when one person objected to the notion that sex is "using a woman as a toilet"

It’s not a bleak view of female sexuality so much as a bleak (and realistic) view of how men view having sex. IE, “I put my dick in you, you lose.” And since women exist in the P for the express purpose of serving men in which ever way the men see fit, they have been raised to show love for their men by letting them do what they want – by serving them. Many women may want to have sex with men, but the way we get to do that, and what that sex means, socially, is generally out of our control.

We’ve all been raised with the idea that this is what sex just is, so men, consciously or no, practice their sexuality the way they’ve been taught. For all of us it’s not about sexual desire for the opposite sex per se, but rather doing sex the way the P has taught us. Or rather, just what Andrea Dworkin was quoted as saying earlier.

I've had sex before and as a male I can say I never thought of it as "haha I win you lose! I don't even like this, the patriarchy just taught me to do it to keep you in you place. Take *that* toilet!".

I've thought "I'm having sex I'm having sex I can't believe it I'm actually having sex hurray!"

But that's not quite the same thing. I doubt the people who make such claims have ever had a relationship with a man. And if so I find it next to impossible that it was a healthy one.