Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Men's Group

(36,922 posts)

7. Actually your own link disputes that

Sun Apr 7, 2013, 10:16 PM

Apr 2013

The CBPP lists three reasons why women pay less into the plan yet earn more. So there's more to it than just life expectancy.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Is Social Security sexist? [View all] Major Nikon Apr 2013 OP

If men lived as long as women, then no. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2013 #3

So it really depends on if you look at it from equality or outcomes Major Nikon Apr 2013 #6

Actually your own link disputes that Major Nikon Apr 2013 #7

A definition of sexist is probably worthwhile. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2013 #14

Looks like you've got somebody's attention.. opiate69 Apr 2013 #4

And............ self-deleted.... opiate69 Apr 2013 #9

And grandly locked it is... TreasonousBastard Apr 2013 #10

Neither my mother nor grandmother worked... TreasonousBastard Apr 2013 #8

That's true- it wasn't intended to be a primary pension, but... TreasonousBastard Apr 2013 #12

I'm with you on that Major Nikon Apr 2013 #13