Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lostnfound

(17,110 posts)
2. Not exactly "mirror image", it would be interesting to know what the poorest 10 % has...
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 07:57 AM
Jul 2015

But obviously that would likely be a negative number in terms of net wealth.

But even comparing the top 1% to the bottom 50 %..
Top 1 % own 43"%
Bottom 50% own between 1.1% and 2.5% -- say, 2%.

Imagine a wealth tax on the top 1% getting distributed to the bottom 50%.. What effect would that have?

With a one-time wealth tax of 20% -- then 8.6% gets distributed from the 1%ers to the bottom half, the 1%ers are left with 35%, and the bottom HALF get to QUINTUPLE their wealth, going from 2% to 10.6%. The wealthy lose 20%, while half of the country increases what it has by 500%.

The country could theoretically DOUBLE the wealth of the bottom half, by imposing a tax of just 5% on the wealth belonging to the 1%ers.

Of course, the wealth is sometimes tied up in illiquid assets like land, and the bottom half likely wouldn't hold onto that wealth; they'd spend it on necessities and small luxuries, but wouldn't that be a big boost to the economy?

Doing these calculations based on income rather than wealth would be interesting.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Poverty»U.S. Wealth Concentration...»Reply #2