...expensive and land and material intensive and thus unsustainable. Their intrinsic lack reliabilty makes them dependent on fossil fuels, despite all the efforts of hydrogen liars to claim it can or should be or worse is mase from so called "renewable energy." The trillions of dollars sacrificed on the altar of the reactionary cult of "renewable energy" has left the planet in flames.
All of the "renewable energy" infrastructure will be landfill before today's newborns graduate from college, another liability left to future generations about which our antinukes, hydrogen dopes and otherwise, could never give a flying fuck.
Oh, we have a few who pay lipservice to giving a shit, for instance an idiot who likes to cite Jim Hansen while apparently being unable to grasp even the basic undergraduate or even high school level of science and engineering.
So called "renewable energy" will never be as clean or safe or as sustainable as nuclear energy. Comparing nuclear to fossil fuel dependent junk is ethically and intellectually absurd.