Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Vegetarian, Vegan and Animal Rights

2naSalit

(96,271 posts)

4. Policy change could fix that.

Reply to Beringia (Original post)

Tue Feb 12, 2019, 12:09 AM

Feb 2019

Many conservation groups have, for years, made proposals to shift the funding so that they can participate in the agency policies like hunters get to. But noooo, can't do that, then they would be able to actually do something significant in the way of conserving nature rather than exploiting it all the time and only allowing the exploiters to have a say in policy matters.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Decline In Hunters Threatens How U.S. Pays For Conservation [View all] Beringia Feb 2019 OP

Virginia's Game and Inland Fishery is fully self funded underpants Feb 2019 #1

Wow. You would think that in a country with more then 393 million civilian owned firearms, there CentralMass Feb 2019 #2

Damn good point! BigmanPigman Feb 2019 #3

I think we benefit from the irregular distribution of guns exboyfil Feb 2019 #5

Policy change could fix that. 2naSalit Feb 2019 #4

Yes, I was just going to post on that Beringia Feb 2019 #6

It's a major issue 2naSalit Feb 2019 #7