Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Israel/Palestine
In reply to the discussion: UNESCO Adopts Controversial Jerusalem Resolution [View all]Little Tich
(6,171 posts)34. According to international law, Russia is an occupying power in Ukrainian Crimea, not a sovereign.
Russia should respect the Budapest Memorandum it signed and withdraw. Ukraine is the only state with sovereign claim to Crimea.
While this thread isn't about Russian invasions, the inadmissibility of acquiring territories through war can be applied to Israel too. I must however say that if Israel had given the Palestinians in Eastern Jerusalem civil rights and Israeli citizenship, I couldn't have cared less for any non-Israeli claims to Jerusalem...
In a way, our differences boil down to whether the Palestinians in East Jerusalem have rights or not.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The U.S., Britain, Germany, Holland, Lithuania and Estonia voted against the resolution.
oberliner
Oct 2016
#1
It's never a good thing when a fascist leader starts gobbling up parts of neighboring countries in
Little Tich
Oct 2016
#17
According to international law, Russia is an occupying power in Ukrainian Crimea, not a sovereign.
Little Tich
Oct 2016
#34
I hope you understand that it's not even a de facto annexation until every single Palestinian
Little Tich
Oct 2016
#46
If there's no legal framework for how wars are waged, it will open up for all kinds of atrocities,
Little Tich
Oct 2016
#16
I'm not sure a 2-state proposal exists that puts the wall in a future Palestinian state.
shira
Oct 2016
#23
Why is it so wrong to extend the notion of democratic rights to include Palestinians?
Little Tich
Oct 2016
#29
You seem to be working under the assumption that an anti-Israel resolution condemning Israel's
Little Tich
Oct 2016
#33
Aha - so that's why I didn't find any anti-Semitism in the resolution itself...
Little Tich
Oct 2016
#39
The release is accurate, stop with the denial. While the resolution says Jerusalem...
shira
Oct 2016
#40
If the allegations that Israel was changing the status quo in Jerusalem were untrue,
Little Tich
Oct 2016
#41