Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Israel/Palestine

Eko

(9,081 posts)

8. That is a fair point.

Reply to revmclaren (Reply #7)

Sat Apr 27, 2024, 08:20 PM

Apr 2024

I would still say that there is a bit of a difference. One would be using civilians from the other side as a human shield. It would also be fair to point out that Hamas might be doing the same with Israeli civilians as well though with their captors. Two would be using them to advance on what they perceive as possible enemy as the IDF soldier did. Three would be there is video of it. As I said I think that is a bit different but in all cases using human shields is just plain wrong and a crime on both sides.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Palestinian says Israeli soldiers used him as human shield in West Bank [View all] David__77 Apr 2024 OP

Why the sudden interest in Palestinians being used as human shields? Beastly Boy Apr 2024 #1

Thank goodness there is interest rather than complete indifference. David__77 Apr 2024 #2

Complete indifference by the media to Hamas using human shields in Gaza for seven months. Beastly Boy Apr 2024 #3

This article does pertain to an incident in the West Bank portrayed on the man's phone video. David__77 Apr 2024 #4

Indeed it does. And I am grateful to the media for publishing it, as I am for Mr. Abu Ras making through it unharmed, Beastly Boy Apr 2024 #5

I think there is a bit of a difference between a soldier physically putting an enemy Eko Apr 2024 #6

Not when you compare 30,000 to one. revmclaren Apr 2024 #7

That is a fair point. Eko Apr 2024 #8

Assuming the facts match the account, this is indeed a crime. Beastly Boy Apr 2024 #9

Yes, assuming the facts match the acount Eko Apr 2024 #10

Well, if you need me to spell it out: Beastly Boy Apr 2024 #11

No, you agreed with that in post 9. Eko Apr 2024 #12

No, a made up difference without distinction is not important to me at all. Beastly Boy Apr 2024 #13

The difference is that this is two rogue soldiers, not a military strategy implemented by a government. lapucelle Apr 2024 #15

Indeed there is a difference: Here, two individual soldiers appear to be committing a war crime, not "Israel". lapucelle Apr 2024 #14

I can agree with that. Eko Apr 2024 #16