Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: Skygate 911 [View all]superbeachnut
(381 posts)77. Why can't the super pilots for truth source what they say they can source
Last edited Sat Jun 7, 2014, 01:05 PM - Edit history (1)
Proof pilots for truth lack the comprehension skills to figure out 911. johndoeX implies he can source something and prove it is bogus, then he can't, as if he forgot he claims he can. oops
Once he does, you may understand why he failed to source it. - johndoeX
Boeing built the 767 to 1.2Vd, means Flight 175 was able to fly 580 mph maybe more with no aerodynamic anomalies, like flutter, and all the BS pilots for truth say make that speed impossible. RADAR and Video prove it was Flight 175. Pilots for truth can't prove otherwise with their offer no theory silly claims.
Why do you put in silly talk in, making up stupid aero claims.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
177 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Jetblue Captain and Aeronautical Engineer falls for Skygate 911 lies and fake Vg diagram
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#71
math expert debunks pilots for truth math, pilot for truth forum thread confirms it
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#44
pilots for truth fail to decode what a mathematician can, so much for experts
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#48
Fake Vg diagram, inability to post the structural failure speed - pilots for truth
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#53
Why can't the super pilots for truth source what they say they can source
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#77
pilots for truth talk Technobabble with aerodynamics and can't explain their dumb-speak
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#81
Where is the core, why do they not help spread lies of impossible speeds, and fake Vg diagrams
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#111
pilots for truth unable to state the structural failure speed on their fake Vg diagram
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#43
Fake Vg diagram supported with... nothing, pilots for truth fake Vg diagram supports lies about 911
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#60
sign of no evidence, for lies of "structual failure at 425 KEAS", and fake Vg diagram, flying a desk
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#88
How does this save the fake Vg diagram or the structural failure speed lie
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#55
Paranoid conspiracy theorist fall for pilot for truth fake Vg diagrams and other lies
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#65
paranoid conspiracy theorist post more lies and paranoia instead of evidence
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#67
A fake Vg diagram appears in the Skygate video with the lie of structual failure at 425 KEAS
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#78
pilots for truth make fake Vg diagram and explain how to fake the Vg diagram, without engineering
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#86
Pilots for truth can't find the spec the 767 was built to, a reflection of their fake 767 Vg diagram
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#129
Seger, are you familiar with real world exercise, practical application, and precedent?
johndoeX
Jun 2014
#134
Fake speeds, fake Vg diagram, failed physics, what is the next fake claim from pilots for truth
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#132
To any person with a WORKING brain SOMETHING IS TERRIBLY WRONG WITH WHAT WE'VE BEEN TOLD ABOUT 9/11.
dballance
Jun 2014
#158
More nonsense sponsored by pilots for truth, more hearsay and exageration
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#171
Working brain? You fell for lies in the "The Big Bamboozle", you were Bamboozled
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#168
pilots for truth can't defend impossible speed lie, no support from rational Aero Engineers
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#176