Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MADem

(135,425 posts)
24. Greenspan has more "hits" and "visibility" than
Mon Oct 14, 2013, 11:47 PM
Oct 2013

Mitchell, Amanpour and Rubin combined.

Andrea Mitchell didn't marry a schmuck. At the time of her wedding, she was marrying one of the most powerful men in the world. Nowadays, he's retired, but when he was on the job, he made E. F. Hutton look like an amateur (i.e., when he talked, the WORLD listened).

Just like James Rubin married one of the most powerful WOMEN in the world. There are many countries in the world where Andrea Mitchell can walk unrecognized, but there isn't a corner of this planet where Christiane Amanpour can walk without being known for the famed international reporter that she is. Now, she's certainly an "influencer" owing to the platform she has on television, but she doesn't have one one thousandth of the clout that Greenspan had--all he had to say was "irrational exuberance" and people started clutching their wallets frantically.

The fame of Alan G:

http://www.amazon.com/Alan-Shrugged-Greenspan-Worlds-Powerful/dp/047139906X
Books were written about this guy--that's just one of several...

This, though, is the point everyone is trying to make:


http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2000/12/hitchens-200012

Now into his fourth term as Federal Reserve chairman, Alan Greenspan holds unparalleled power, despite a history of idealism that started with his worship of Ayn Rand. But Greenspan's official record, as he rose to near-mystical pre-eminence, shows how Washington can compromise even the most passionate of principles.

The annual White House Correspondents' Dinner is a feast of sycophancy and pretended satire, and last April's gathering was no exception. Only one real shaft was launched all evening, when the night's designated jester, Jay Leno, jutted himself toward Hillary Clinton and inquired, “What's it like being married to the most powerful man in the world? Let's ask Andrea Mitchell.” Everybody laughed. Nobody missed the point. This country is in awe of a mousy, bespectacled accountant with enigmatic powers—America's least-likely celebrity.


Everyone laughed. Nobody missed the point.

Greenspan was a powerful guy, and he is intimately--as a consequence of serving for 2 decades as Fed Chair--associated with a school of economic/political thought. It's not unreasonable to think that when his spouse says something that matches his POV, that one might think the spouse is carrying his water.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Calling wives by their husbands' name [View all] question everything Oct 2013 OP
Yep. I noticed that sexist crap. DURHAM D Oct 2013 #1
Personally, when I learned the Hillary Rodham bowed to conventional pressures SheilaT Oct 2013 #2
I only wonder about the child question everything Oct 2013 #13
I have no issues with women or men adopting the spouses name Peacetrain Oct 2013 #3
But that isn't the issue here. It's substituting a woman's professional name Gormy Cuss Oct 2013 #9
I always took the "Mrs. Greenspan" comments as the writer suggesting that MADem Oct 2013 #12
Of course it is. Then call her RWer Andrea question everything Oct 2013 #14
I think it's shorthand. MADem Oct 2013 #16
It's not your business, but it's okay with you for others to call her by the wrong surname? Gormy Cuss Oct 2013 #17
It's not my business what people choose to call THEMSELVES on their MADem Oct 2013 #19
Are you suggesting that he's been called that here with any equivalence to Mitchell? Gormy Cuss Oct 2013 #20
Greenspan has more "hits" and "visibility" than MADem Oct 2013 #24
And none of that matters to this discussion. Gormy Cuss Oct 2013 #25
Well, you have your mind made up on this matter and this IS a protected group, MADem Oct 2013 #27
No one's kicking you out Gormy Cuss Oct 2013 #28
This message was self-deleted by its author seaglass Oct 2013 #4
Trend now HockeyMom Oct 2013 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author seaglass Oct 2013 #8
I'm amazed at how 'sticky' the name change convention is. Gormy Cuss Oct 2013 #10
I see that calling Andrea Mitchell, Mrs. Greenspan, Big Blue Marble Oct 2013 #5
This is completely bogus - DURHAM D Oct 2013 #7
That is such a classy response. Big Blue Marble Oct 2013 #11
As I replied, above, she is NBC national correspondent for foreign affairs question everything Oct 2013 #15
If Ms Mitchell is a journalist, Big Blue Marble Oct 2013 #21
She has been in the business since the mid-60s. DURHAM D Oct 2013 #18
Please do not worry about my education. Big Blue Marble Oct 2013 #22
You may or may not be "educated" but you are definitely DURHAM D Oct 2013 #23
You're getting upset over nothing jollyreaper2112 Oct 2013 #26
Read up thread. Gormy Cuss Oct 2013 #29
No, you're still wrong jollyreaper2112 Oct 2013 #30
I don't recall ever seeing Carville called" Mr. Matalin." Gormy Cuss Oct 2013 #31
and my point jollyreaper2112 Oct 2013 #32
Yes, you do. And you're projecting. Gormy Cuss Oct 2013 #33
Wives should be referred to using the name they choose. MadrasT Oct 2013 #34
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Feminists»Calling wives by their hu...»Reply #24