Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
3. Texas has an ultrasound law already
Sun Feb 26, 2012, 10:13 PM
Feb 2012

It's before the courts, the 5th Circuit ruled in favor of the ultrasound law, overturning a lower court's decision.

Court allows Texas law on ultrasound before abortion

(Reuters) - A Texas law requiring abortion providers to show or describe an ultrasound image to a woman of her pregnancy and to play sounds of the fetal heart does not violate the Constitution, a federal appeals court ruled on Tuesday.

The court ruled that the ultrasound requirements do not infringe on abortion providers' free speech rights, overturning a lower federal court's decision.

"The required disclosures of a sonogram, the fetal heartbeat, and their medical descriptions are the epitome of truthful, non-misleading information," Chief Judge Edith Jones wrote for the three-judge panel.

The Texas law, enacted in 2011, requires abortion providers to display the ultrasound images and describe them in detail. While a woman seeking an abortion can decline to view the legally required ultrasound, she cannot decline to hear the physician's description of it unless she qualifies for an exception due to rape, incest or fetal abnormality.
-snip-
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/10/us-abortion-texas-idUSTRE8091XF20120110


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Feminists»It's not just Virginia th...»Reply #3