Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(36,192 posts)
4. I'm very familiar with the science of Hanford and have written about it here.
Thu May 15, 2025, 12:37 PM
May 15

The claim is bullshit and nonsensical.

It would be interesting if people were as interested in say, extreme global heating and the release of neurotoxic heavy metals like lead and mercury as they are in worrying about a few atoms of plutonium.

Hanford is proving to be an Oklo redux, which is good news.

Money squandered to clean it up will save very few lives since few lives are at risk. We could save far more lives by spending the money on serious health risks, for just one example, endemic PFAS contamination, among a million other things.

If the world needs anything right now, it would be more, not less, plutonium. Plutonium mysticism is part of the reason the planet is bursting into flames.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Health»The US buried millions of...»Reply #4