Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RockRaven

(17,638 posts)
3. The thing about meta-analyses is that "garbage in" gives you "garbage out"
Thu Mar 12, 2020, 02:01 AM
Mar 2020

There is no "new evidence" here, NYT. It's a compilation of previously published evidence, the significance (colloquial meaning) of which may be raised by the process of aggregating the data.

Which may or may not be useful, because the question(s) those studies set out to address may or may not be useful.

This reads like sensationalist click-bait. Jesus Christ, journalists should stop writing breathless articles about Cochrane publications.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Support Forums»Addiction & Recovery»Alcoholics Anonymous vs. ...»Reply #3