Deaf/Hard of Hearing

Silent Type

(8,890 posts)

3. Thanks for the info. I tried one of the small in ear models, and it did help watching TV, etc.

Wed Jun 5, 2024, 01:05 PM

Jun 2024

But they squeled and I couldn't stop it without taking them out and putting them in the case. So, sent them back. Think they were called Audien Pro or something. They were only $290. While I did not find them natural sounding, they did help. And I didn't wear them most of the time.

The Jabra Enhance do get good reviews, so I might try them after reading your post. And the ability to change settings and frequencies on my phone would be welcome.

Again, thanks for posting.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

In the ear or behind-the-ear, that is the question [View all] peggysue2 Jun 2024 OP

Do you wear glasses? eallen Jun 2024 #1

It is, but the increased hearing is usually worth it. Biophilic Jun 2024 #2

I do not wear regular glasses, eallen but . . . peggysue2 Jun 2024 #4

Thanks for the info. I tried one of the small in ear models, and it did help watching TV, etc. Silent Type Jun 2024 #3

You're welcome, Silent Type peggysue2 Jun 2024 #6

Thanks for the info. virgdem Jun 2024 #5

The Jabras range from $995 to $1995 depending . . . peggysue2 Jun 2024 #8

Thanks Peggysue virgdem Jun 2024 #12

Glad to hear these work for you Bayard Jun 2024 #7

Sorry to hear that, Bayard peggysue2 Jun 2024 #10

IMHO, as a hearing aid user of many types since 2003, I consider the in-the-ear advantage to be primarily cosmetic Wonder Why Jun 2024 #9

Thanks for that suggestion, Wonder Why peggysue2 Jun 2024 #11

I wear a bone conduction type body aid. LiberalFighter Jul 2024 #13

I've had the Kirkland behind-the-ear for years now Bolo Boffin Jul 2024 #14