Welcome to DU!
    The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
    Join the community:
    Create a free account
    Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
    Become a Star Member
    Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
    All Forums
        Issue Forums
        Culture Forums
        Alliance Forums
        Region Forums
        Support Forums
        Help & Search
    
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: The most effective and most often used murder weapon [View all]beevul
(12,194 posts)38. Says you.
        There wouldn't be 410 million gun owners in existence after 5 years, which, allowing for maybe 10% deaths & giving up guns, would ridiculously be more than the ~325 million US population. 
So what? If, IF your goal is to tally those who did versus those who didn't, that's the applicable math.
I allowed for a total of 100 million gun owners in existence {or gone} after 5 years for calculation purposes, which is far closer to the facts than your ridiculous contention of 410 million.
Its not MY contention, jimmy, its YOURS:
80,000,000 gun owners - 2000 ------ 80,000 shootings & gundeaths (0.1% x gunowners) 
81,000,000 ..... " ........ - 2001 ------ 81,000 ..... "
82,000,000 ..... " ........ - 2002 ------ 82,000 ..... "
83,000,000 ..... " ........ - 2003 ------ 83,000 ..... "
84,000,000 ..... " ........ - 2004 ------ 84,000 ..... "
........................................ total = 410,000
81,000,000 ..... " ........ - 2001 ------ 81,000 ..... "
82,000,000 ..... " ........ - 2002 ------ 82,000 ..... "
83,000,000 ..... " ........ - 2003 ------ 83,000 ..... "
84,000,000 ..... " ........ - 2004 ------ 84,000 ..... "
........................................ total = 410,000
You wrote that. You came up with the hypothetical numbers. I just finished your math is all.
You find the shooting/kill percentage of existing plus dead or gone gun owners in America after 5 years, using your 0.1% claim. 410 thousand is 0.41% of 100 million, rough estimate. 
That's funny, the calculator says its .1 percent. Your 'rough estimate' is off by a factor of 4.
.. you are now double counting gun owners to make an invalid contention. Ha, double count? quintuple counting.
Nope, I'm just tallying them once. You on the other hand tally up the deaths and injuries but don't bother with the rest.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
  Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
						
							47 replies
							
								 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
                     = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
        
        Apologies accepted, but you should seek treatment for that case of Markley's Syndrome:
        friendly_iconoclast
        Feb 2016
        #5
      
        
        Especially a single action sig...you can buy 2 plastic striker junkers for that one sig.
        ileus
        Feb 2016
        #13
      
        
        No, the gun wackos love to say a gun is just a tool, like a fire  extinguisher, which is BS. nt
        Logical
        Mar 2016
        #21
      
        
        Tool- "a device or implement...used to carry out a particular function"
        friendly_iconoclast
        Mar 2016
        #29