Welcome to DU!
    The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
    Join the community:
    Create a free account
    Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
    Become a Star Member
    Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
    All Forums
        Issue Forums
        Culture Forums
        Alliance Forums
        Region Forums
        Support Forums
        Help & Search
    
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Cruz’s Gun Control Deception [View all]gejohnston
(17,502 posts)60. Is your goal saving lives or culture war?
        I frankly believe it is culture war and ideology.  You confuse the terms compromise and concession.  More on that later.  As always, anti gun types will be back for more.  See California.
because the overwhelming evidence is that there will be no lives saved.  The only countries I know of that have complete bans, outside of North Korea, are in this hemisphere like Mexico, Cuba, Venezuela, Bermuda, several Caribbean countries.  Others are stricter than Australia or UK like Brazil.  They WISH they had our murder rate.
There appears to be consensus in this forum, that 80% of all firearm related deaths are not due to lack of gun control 
Although that leaves 20% that can be done with gun control.
 No.  I said homicides.  Any save would be offset by lives saved with a gun.  Those actually out number criminal use according to most criminologists.  A complete ban would eliminate 60 percent of all gun deaths.  That is about 20K people.  The down side is that there will be 20K more rope deaths.  Remember my rant about Bloomberg et al not caring about lives?  Our violent crime rate is half of what it was when all but two states had restrictive or no concealed carry.
Although that leaves 20% that can be done with gun control.
Better background filters for specific guns?
 Why?  How would that affect the black market?  BTW, there has been since FDR.
Mandatory training for all gun owners? Bi-yearly?
  Why?  Accidents and negligence is almost nonexistent.  Besides, the average rural teenager is actually better trained and more responsible with firearms than most urban police.  If you want to discuss training, start there.  Cops are also less law abiding and more likely to hit an innocent than a CCW holder. 
NRA sponsored education events to promote gun safety?
 They and local grassroots groups already do.
What are
You mention funding for ATF. ATF funding isn't the real problem. Throwing more money at their mismanagement won't solve anything, especially since we have US attorneys who refuse to prosecute cases. When local police hand over gang members to the feds for felon in possession, the local US attorney seems to have better things to do. Same with straw buyers, who can get up to ten years, at most will get a year probation. There have been more federal gun crime prosecutions under fucking Bush than now. How about we start with prosecuting the ones they do get?
Speaking of illegal guns. Europe is awash in automatic weapons made in the former Soviet Block, like the ones used in the attacks in France. The machine guns used in the first attacks were purchased at a train station in Brussels. The latest ones were from a "dark web" site in Germany.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
  Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
						
							79 replies
							
								 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
                     = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
        
        re: "In 2014, Washington, D.C., reported 15.9 murders for every 100,000 people..."
        discntnt_irny_srcsm
        Apr 2016
        #7
      
        
        I think they just desperately want to think of themselves as "moderates" on gun control
        DonP
        Apr 2016
        #55
      
        
        Simple Definition of conjecture : an opinion or idea formed without proof or sufficient evidence
        aurelius2112
        Apr 2016
        #61
      
        
        "I have come here...with the objective of trying to draw some consensus" I doubt that very much
        friendly_iconoclast
        Apr 2016
        #67
      
        
        OK, which *extant* gun regulation(s) would you be willing to give up, in exchange for others?
        friendly_iconoclast
        Apr 2016
        #71
      
        
        You've pointed out once again the gun controller's fraudulent version of 'reasonableness':
        friendly_iconoclast
        Apr 2016
        #73
      
        
        "Assault weapons" are civilian non-automatics (mostly small caliber), not machineguns.
        benEzra
        Apr 2016
        #50
      
  