Science Fiction

lazarus

(27,383 posts)

9. that wasn't very twisty, though

Sat Dec 10, 2011, 02:08 PM

Dec 2011

It's a fairly simple explanation. I have no idea if it's valid, as I'm not one who reads the expanded universe stuff to learn all the background info. I liked the first two films, had huge problems with the third, have more problems with the first two if I think about them as anything but fantasy ("only stormtroopers are this accurate", but they can't hit a thing when rebels are involved), and the prequels are simply abominations.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"Star Wars vs. Star Trek: An Objective Analysys" [View all] krispos42 Dec 2011 OP

Bah! That's not how you start a flamewar! TheWraith Dec 2011 #1

UFP/Starfleet warship vs. Babylon 5 cruiser? krispos42 Dec 2011 #2

been done pokerfan Dec 2011 #11

So Star Wars' flaws are 100 times worse than Star Trek's? Fozzledick Dec 2011 #3

Star Trek - Made up terms that sounds like they are describing real scientific systems or phenomena MilesColtrane Dec 2011 #4

It's fun watching SW fans turn themselves into petzels to explain that one. krispos42 Dec 2011 #5

Hmmm... FloridaJudy Dec 2011 #6

It's not that difficult lazarus Dec 2011 #7

Uh-huh. krispos42 Dec 2011 #8

that wasn't very twisty, though lazarus Dec 2011 #9

I don't read the expanded stuff either krispos42 Dec 2011 #10

There's a wormhole that shortens the distance? FloridaJudy Dec 2011 #13

I always asked myself, who is cleaning the carpet ? jakeXT Dec 2011 #12

That's Grovelbot's new job. FloridaJudy Dec 2011 #14

It's the 24th century salvorhardin Feb 2012 #16

Star Trek is science fiction and Star Wars is fantasy. I see no connection TheKentuckian Feb 2012 #15

I find your lack of faith disturbing. Swede Mar 2012 #17