Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Baseball

In reply to the discussion: 'Swing-off'? [View all]

ProfessorGAC

(73,756 posts)
7. And?
Thu Jul 17, 2025, 04:18 PM
Jul 17

You went a very long way to say it wasn't about money by providing financial information. All I said was the All-Star game was about money. The game meets the definition of exhibition game, as it is just a show for the money.
That's not cynicism. That's an obvious conclusion from knowing how big business works.
If MLB didn't get a premium from Fox for the game, they'd pit it out for bid.
If Fox doesn't get a return for the incremental price for the ASG, they would just buy the rights to those Saturday games.
It is obvious, with what networks have done to their news divisions, that major media doesn't do loss leaders.
And, since I think ASGs don't mean much in any sport, the only reason to have them is the cash they generate. Which is what I said.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

'Swing-off'? [View all] Oeditpus Rex Jul 16 OP
We're playing Mighty Manfred Ball, where the All Star game is decided by rsdsharp Jul 16 #1
Well said Auggie Jul 17 #2
Huh? ProfessorGAC Jul 17 #3
If it doesn't matter Oeditpus Rex Jul 17 #4
Money? ProfessorGAC Jul 17 #5
You seem more cynical than I am Oeditpus Rex Jul 17 #6
And? ProfessorGAC Jul 17 #7
You think all-star games lack meaning Oeditpus Rex Jul 17 #8
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Baseball»'Swing-off'?»Reply #7