Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Major Nikon

(36,922 posts)
9. It does, but then it also goes on to make the same familiar smear
Sat Nov 16, 2019, 06:10 PM
Nov 2019

It posits that one can't disparage a particular religion without disparaging all religionists who subscribe to that religion.

It's more than a bit ironic when religionists claim intolerance whenever someone criticizes their religion as if it's no different than intolerance of the religioinists themselves. Their own intolerance robs them of the critical thinking ability required to differentiate between those things.

It's really just more of the same. The idea is as long as atheists just STFU about the inherent downsides to religion, they will get along just fine. The difference is at least the author is at least somewhat receptive to the idea there is wickedness for which religion is at least partly responsible, but it's unsurprisingly written off as "cultural" and the product of "extremists" as if the mainstream religion itself is free from fault.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Seeking Common Ground: Wh...»Reply #9