Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Occupy Underground

Showing Original Post only (View all)

ck4829

(38,046 posts)
Mon May 4, 2026, 12:52 PM Monday

New York state Senate passes bill aiming to crack down on 'ghost job' postings [View all]

"I see 'help wanted' signs everywhere..." Oh wait, what's this?

The New York state Senate this week passed a bill that aims to crack down on postings of so-called “ghost jobs.”

The legislation, which passed 39-19 in the upper chamber, would amend the state’s labor law to require job advertisements to disclose if and when an employer intends to hire someone for a position.

Pushed by Democratic state Sen. Mike Gianaris, the bill is in response to “ghost jobs,” which is often a position that looks open but is not. A ghost job might be a position that a company posts but has no actual intention of filling. Companies that post ghost jobs may do so to make them appear bigger than they actually are or make it appear that they are continuing to grow. They may also post the position but intend to actually hire for it months later.

A study by Clarify Capital, a team of small business veterans who help others make financial decisions, found that one in seven job postings were ghost jobs out of 175,000 live job listings on the third-party job website Indeed.

https://spectrumlocalnews.com/nys/central-ny/politics/2026/04/30/n-y--state-senate-passes-bill-to-crack-down-on--ghost-job--postings
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Occupy Underground»New York state Senate pas...»Reply #0