As you may recall, Obama's lead up to declaring his candidacy was very similar. He campaigned his heart out for Democrats in the 2006 election; she did in 2010. Hillary's camp insists she's going to raise the most money and that somehow equates with "winning." As Obama did, Elizabeth is capable of raising a shit-ton of money online. I am squeezed by a recent $500/month rent increase, but I'd send her what I could and probably some I couldn't.
Elizabeth CAN do this if she is willing to put herself out as a candidate, but not as a stalking horse as some have suggested. She embodies the spirit of populism that is rising up in this country. Hillary is the antithesis of populism. She cannot mouth Elizabeth's words and be taken seriously. She is a hawk, one that scares the shit out of me too. Her hubris (e.g. Syria, Libya, Iran, etc.) and recklessness should preclude her from being anywhere near the gears of foreign policy. And her commiserating with Wall Street/banks is nowhere in the ballpark of liberal. Her husband promoted and signed the repeal of Glass-Steagall which was a primary factor in the economic collapse 10 years later after Bill had left the scene of the crime. I am confident Hillary will continue the deregulation and happily sign any bill the GOP puts forward.
This is Elizabeth's time. Her voice in opposition to the DINO being shoved down our throats is sorely needed. The party MUST have this debate. Hillary's insipid campaign direction is gag-worthy. Her actual record is being given a makeover as if we as voters are slobbering dolts that will blindly accept such revisionist history.
Run.Elizabeth.Run.