Welcome to DU!
    The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
    Join the community:
    Create a free account
    Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
    Become a Star Member
    Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
    All Forums
        Issue Forums
        Culture Forums
        Alliance Forums
        Region Forums
        Support Forums
        Help & Search
    
Populist Reform of the Democratic Party
In reply to the discussion: Populist Group Post: Is it really out of order to mention Bill Clinton? [View all]merrily
(45,251 posts)29. Please see Reply 21.
        Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
  Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
						
							57 replies
							
								 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
                     = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
                        Populist Group Post:  Is it really out of order to mention Bill Clinton? [View all]
							merrily
							May 2015
							OP
                        
        
        Did some one think the Cliintons would not be questioned, criticised, attacked ... from the left ...
        JoePhilly
        May 2015
        #1
      
        
        ? My post doesn't say someone thought the Clintons would not be attacked or anything like that.
        merrily
        May 2015
        #2
      
        
        Clinton supporters might want to say that he and Chelsea are off limits.  I disagree.
        NYC_SKP
        May 2015
        #3
      
        
        AFAIK, Hillary has never associated herself with Chelsea's Wall Street or media jobs
        merrily
        May 2015
        #5
      
        
        No problems, it's just that sometimes people don't realize where they are when they post.
        NYC_SKP
        May 2015
        #12
      
        
        No, we aren't looking to block people, but we are looking for a safe haven for like-minded people
        merrily
        May 2015
        #33
      
        
        Children are deemed to have been off limits because they did not seek the spotlight, only a parent
        merrily
        May 2015
        #7
      
        
        Chelsea is now an adult, hedge funder and overpaid media "journalist", foundation board member.
        NYC_SKP
        May 2015
        #14
      
        
        I meant that my OP did not attempt to make any case about Chelsea. I am not trying to say
        merrily
        May 2015
        #21
      
        
        Thanks.  If the subject comes up, you or anyone who wishes can always link to this thread.
        merrily
        May 2015
        #20
      
        
        I will not ignore NAFTA, the Telecommunications Act and Gramm, Leach, Bliley.
        Enthusiast
        May 2015
        #17
      
        
        I've been reading that she may try to disassociate herself from ending "welfare as we know it."
        merrily
        May 2015
        #24
      
        
        It's not really any different than bringing up W or HW when talking about Jeb Bush
        arcane1
        May 2015
        #26
      
        
        It isn't just fair to bring Bill AND Hillary into this, it is necessary.
        whereisjustice
        May 2015
        #39
      
        
        Not even going to read your bs. J. Sanders was never sold as Sanders' co-Senator or any of things
        merrily
        Dec 2015
        #47
      
        
        Jane Sanders hasn't been in a position yet where she could do really serious damage.
        pnwmom
        Dec 2015
        #48
      
        
        That's what you're always accusing the Clintons of. Clintons, meet Jane Sanders.
        pnwmom
        Dec 2015
        #50
      
        
        Hillary is no populist, but YOU are the one posting in this group, not Hillary,
        merrily
        Dec 2015
        #54
      
        
        PS When did you complain about the Clinton foundation reporting $10,000,000 as zero?
        merrily
        Dec 2015
        #52
      
  