Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Liberal YouTubers

Justice matters.

(9,303 posts)

3. Not "just" standing on principle... Re: Coverup accomplices?

Reply to PoindexterOglethorpe (Reply #1)

Fri Dec 26, 2025, 02:07 AM

Yesterday

Now since blondi and patel did not comply with the law (meaning, they're subject to being accused of covering up), all the lawyers who were participating in that redaction "business" in March are also subject of getting caught up in this crime (covering up to prevent transparency).

So that's a LOT of possibilities for whistleblowers to come forward with all they know about what they were ordered to do...

On edit: Not just in potential criminal cases to be held later when the Dems will win majorities, but also as witnesses in civil cases that are likely coming sooner than that if the fascist regime is not kicked out for a while.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

🚨2900 DOJ Lawyers SUDDENLY QUIT on Trump IN MASS EXODUS - Meidas Touch [View all] Rhiannon12866 Thursday OP

Wow. Given that most people will stay in a job, PoindexterOglethorpe Yesterday #1

Not "just" standing on principle... Re: Coverup accomplices? Justice matters. Yesterday #3

The headline is somewhat misleading as some of them were fired Jarqui Yesterday #2