Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Liberal YouTubers

cab67

(3,832 posts)

2. Given her unwillingness to acknowledge she broke the law....

Reply to 3Hotdogs (Reply #1)

Thu Apr 9, 2026, 08:41 AM

Apr 9

....I'd say 9 years was appropriate. My opinion, anyway.

She still thinks she did the right thing, and if she was still in an official position, she'd try to do it again.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Escape

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Tina Peters Sentence Thrown Out - Raw News And Politics [View all] Rhiannon12866 Apr 9 OP

So she is still guilty but may get a lighter sentence, I support that. I think 9 years was excessive. 3Hotdogs Apr 9 #1

Given her unwillingness to acknowledge she broke the law.... cab67 Apr 9 #2

Just a reasonable difference of opinion. 3Hotdogs Apr 9 #3