Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Loupe Garoue

(63 posts)
15. I think what I read was it only happened at that high percentage in swing states
Mon Nov 18, 2024, 03:13 PM
15 hrs ago

I have been doing a lot of reading about this, and I recall that that is one of the reasons it is raising alarms.

About Those Bullet Ballots [View all] gab13by13 15 hrs ago OP
While I would be fine with a hand count audit, your last sentence is incorrect. bearsfootball516 15 hrs ago #1
Yesterday NJCher 15 hrs ago #2
Not down ballots, you mean bullet ballots. gab13by13 15 hrs ago #4
yes NJCher 15 hrs ago #7
The heck is a bullet ballot? onetexan 2 hrs ago #162
didn't he have those numbers in his duty to warn letter? Native 14 hrs ago #28
I also heard about ballots that voted for Trump and then straight Dems. Weird. OMGWTF 14 hrs ago #33
7% of a state's total is a lot more than 2. gab13by13 15 hrs ago #5
Yes it is bearsfootball516 15 hrs ago #8
I think what I read was it only happened at that high percentage in swing states Loupe Garoue 15 hrs ago #15
Right - it is the statistical anomaly that is raising questions. RandomNumbers 10 hrs ago #128
Except it didn't happen at a higher percentage in swing states. onenote 6 hrs ago #160
I agree. And he answered his own question. Are people that stupid? Ray Bruns 14 hrs ago #17
It happens a LOT, it is called undervoting. yellowdogintexas 13 hrs ago #54
Especially Trumpers JMCKUSICK 13 hrs ago #87
Of course they exist. That's not the point. soldierant 11 hrs ago #118
Only that's all BS soandso 11 hrs ago #120
What is your background with software manipulation resulting in data errors? Forget it...... Hope22 10 hrs ago #124
I'm not into arguing soandso 10 hrs ago #131
I listened to this on Thom's show. He said Kamala was the only one who could request a recount rainy 15 hrs ago #3
Provide evidence of claims for your question Sympthsical 15 hrs ago #6
These claims are made based on available statistics Loupe Garoue 15 hrs ago #16
What available statistics? Wiz Imp 12 hrs ago #102
how about you show your work NJCher 14 hrs ago #19
A hand recount should be welcomed by all. rubbersole 14 hrs ago #20
⬆⬆⬆THIS⬆⬆⬆ Think. Again. 13 hrs ago #48
I agree JoeBydun 13 hrs ago #64
I agree. Do the hand count!!! bikes and bunnies 13 hrs ago #90
This post should be a thread of its own. Fiendish Thingy 14 hrs ago #34
It is either true or it is not true Cirsium 14 hrs ago #37
It's not true. onenote 13 hrs ago #70
Thanks Cirsium 12 hrs ago #108
It is manipulation Zeitghost 11 hrs ago #121
Desperation. TheKentuckian 9 hrs ago #143
Agreed Cirsium 9 hrs ago #144
Stephen Spoonamore has been doing this for awhile. nbsmom 6 hrs ago #158
It's not true SickOfTheOnePct 13 hrs ago #91
Very good nt Cirsium 10 hrs ago #130
How about providing the data to show that it is true? Wiz Imp 12 hrs ago #103
Sure Cirsium 12 hrs ago #109
The difference keepthemhonestO 13 hrs ago #46
The Governor of North Carolina was term limited. yellowdogintexas 13 hrs ago #63
My bad, I was thinking that was keepthemhonestO 10 hrs ago #134
NC governor was not getting "ousted" unc70 13 hrs ago #67
The governor in North Carolina was not unpopular and the repub opponent was a all out disaster onenote 12 hrs ago #111
I keep hearing about irregularities SickOfTheOnePct 12 hrs ago #112
You keepthemhonestO 10 hrs ago #135
Kinda funny you expect a poster on the web to " show your work " but the government doesn't have to questionseverything 13 hrs ago #50
At this point, I'd like the guy the poster is repeating to show his work Sympthsical 13 hrs ago #58
I actually think the letter signed by buell and experts is more convincing questionseverything 13 hrs ago #61
So why not provide the data for us to see?????????????? Wiz Imp 12 hrs ago #104
I showed my work SickOfTheOnePct 12 hrs ago #113
The government(s) Zeitghost 11 hrs ago #122
Numbers were posted, true but they were not counted by human beings questionseverything 10 hrs ago #125
We oversea them through State and Local Officials Zeitghost 10 hrs ago #133
To be clear my comments are not about the bullet ballot claim at all questionseverything 9 hrs ago #142
In 2020 the Maga raised hell over "irregularities" and "anomalies" Walleye 15 hrs ago #9
The big difference is they hand counted Georgia questionseverything 13 hrs ago #57
Correct. They went with zero evidence and turned the country and election process on its head. hadEnuf 13 hrs ago #60
I see evidence and I have questions proud patriot 15 hrs ago #10
You are not nuts, this should be a hand count because it is so close and Bluethroughu 15 hrs ago #11
Asking serious questions is good malaise 15 hrs ago #12
You are grieving, not dumb Tweedy 15 hrs ago #13
The solution is easy....count the paper ballots. Hope22 14 hrs ago #29
Have you withdrawn $45,000 from your retirement account and contributed towards a recount? MichMan 14 hrs ago #38
They keepthemhonestO 13 hrs ago #49
The money is gone. The ballots were counted. Harris lost. tritsofme 13 hrs ago #55
They keepthemhonestO 13 hrs ago #62
In states largely run by Democrats...Sometimes an election just doesn't turn out like you hope. tritsofme 13 hrs ago #78
Where did they recount. Hope22 13 hrs ago #80
None of the races are close enough. They don't just do them for fun. tritsofme 13 hrs ago #86
Yep SickOfTheOnePct 12 hrs ago #114
No but I did get 10 texts a day along with dozens of calls a day to send money to VP Harris over the last six months or Hope22 13 hrs ago #77
The bullet ballots exist Tweedy 11 hrs ago #123
How is it being determined how many "bullet ballots" were cast. This still sounds like bullshit. onenote 15 hrs ago #14
There you go, ruining a perfectly good CT with facts and logic... Fiendish Thingy 14 hrs ago #32
I know. I had the same problem in 2020 when the trumpers were making unsubstantiated claims. onenote 14 hrs ago #43
I have my own theory: Fiendish Thingy 13 hrs ago #51
Here's what I don't understand. Frank D. Lincoln 11 hrs ago #119
The implicit claim is that the number of split-ticket ballots must 0. Igel 9 hrs ago #149
Not zero Loupe Garoue 7 hrs ago #157
So, where did those Arizona and Nevada percentage numbers come from? MineralMan 14 hrs ago #18
From the publicly available Arizona and Nevada websites. onenote 13 hrs ago #53
Yes. I saw your earlier post. MineralMan 13 hrs ago #68
Thanks for the clarification. It would be nice to hear from those accepting Sponamore's claims. onenote 13 hrs ago #71
I get 2.2% for Arizona Sympthsical 13 hrs ago #73
Here's how I got my result. If my math is off, show me how and I'll correct it. onenote 13 hrs ago #79
You're right, I'm wrong Sympthsical 13 hrs ago #83
Yep. And it's not as if you have to some super genius to do so. onenote 13 hrs ago #92
In post #85 SickOfTheOnePct 13 hrs ago #88
I can't replicate any of it Sympthsical 13 hrs ago #93
It can't be replicated SickOfTheOnePct 13 hrs ago #96
That's a good question. Why don't they show us the numbers so we know they are real? Wiz Imp 12 hrs ago #106
That's not what Occam's Razor says SCantiGOP 14 hrs ago #21
Stupid. Straw Man 14 hrs ago #22
Many voters vote only part of the ballot. MineralMan 14 hrs ago #26
Did the guest mention SickOfTheOnePct 14 hrs ago #23
If there were any good sources for those numbers, MineralMan 14 hrs ago #24
Looking at actual numbers tells a different story SickOfTheOnePct 13 hrs ago #85
Keep posting, gab! Kid Berwyn 14 hrs ago #25
It feels like a coup because we lost HereForTheParty 14 hrs ago #41
No, it's because the GOP steals elections. Kid Berwyn 13 hrs ago #59
I'm sure Biden & Kamala are aware of the Bullet Ballots numbers KS Toronado 14 hrs ago #27
You have misquoted Mr. Occam: Fiendish Thingy 14 hrs ago #30
Look gab, I 100% wish what you, and these others are sayin is true. The simple fact is all we want here is PROOF bluestarone 14 hrs ago #31
No Comparison Speaks2 14 hrs ago #35
What supports this hypothesis that there was cheating. HereForTheParty 14 hrs ago #44
I know this stinks keepthemhonestO 14 hrs ago #36
Good points. Welcome to DU! Doodley 13 hrs ago #66
Was keepthemhonestO 9 hrs ago #140
And how smart would it be of these devious hackers to not add votes in races that would help Trump? EdmondDantes_ 14 hrs ago #39
Hand counts will be coming Viz 14 hrs ago #40
It's not a hand recount MichMan 12 hrs ago #116
Yes I agree.... Viz 14 hrs ago #42
How are they linked to fake ballots? HereForTheParty 10 hrs ago #132
K&R Think. Again. 14 hrs ago #45
A friend of mine was a poll watcher in Grand Rapids... Orange Buffoon 13 hrs ago #47
A pole watcher isn't directly watching how people are voting, right oldmanlynn 13 hrs ago #56
They are not allowed to encroach on the voter's space. yellowdogintexas 13 hrs ago #65
I think she came to that conclusion judging by the minimal time they spent Orange Buffoon 13 hrs ago #84
If Trump and the Republicans did cheat in this way oldmanlynn 13 hrs ago #52
Agreed. Should be investigated. I remain coninced that no way did trump win every swing state legitimately. brush 13 hrs ago #69
Why should it raise eyebrows? SickOfTheOnePct 12 hrs ago #115
It's not that complicated. The battleground states are where the deciding Electoral College votes are. brush 10 hrs ago #129
A hand count is not unreasonable wryter2000 13 hrs ago #72
Who is going to pay for it? MichMan 11 hrs ago #117
I don't understand what you think this hand count is supposed to do. Dr. Strange 13 hrs ago #74
Exactly SickOfTheOnePct 13 hrs ago #94
Bullet ballots aren't illegal FakeNoose 13 hrs ago #75
Thank-you! Harris MUST take this seriously - everything is on the line! polichick 13 hrs ago #76
On your side all the way! ananda 13 hrs ago #81
the problem with your argument Oliver Bolliver Butt 13 hrs ago #82
Some numbers soandso 13 hrs ago #89
I see different numbers on Daily Kos article MadameButterfly 10 hrs ago #139
I would go with Decision Desk soandso 9 hrs ago #141
B T W Mr.Bee 13 hrs ago #95
It's ridiculous SickOfTheOnePct 13 hrs ago #97
I brought that up soandso 12 hrs ago #100
It's because we changed to mail Sympthsical 12 hrs ago #107
Are the permitted to start processing them prior to election day? SickOfTheOnePct 12 hrs ago #110
I don't trust anything that MAY be associated with the con man LilElf70 13 hrs ago #98
Steven Spoonamore on The Thom Hartmann Program Live (11/18/2024) - 02:16:30 - 02:28:45 ConcernedCitizen1776 12 hrs ago #99
Thom Hartmann Live - Spoonamore interview - 11/18/2024 ultralite001 12 hrs ago #101
In Nevada in 2020, the total votes for House Reps was 96.5% of the votes for President; in 2024, 96.1% muriel_volestrangler 12 hrs ago #105
Kinda undercut your argument with that last sentence... krkaufman 10 hrs ago #126
K&R SheltieLover 10 hrs ago #127
Building computer hardware is an entirely Progressive dog 10 hrs ago #136
bullet ballots are bs - they fucking made it too rig to big alright - the biggest rig of all time. Nimble_Idea 10 hrs ago #137
As an election judge in a county that went 82% trump... in 2020 hurple 10 hrs ago #138
Critical JR11 9 hrs ago #145
Whats the harm of doing a hand recount in the swing states. Dump got his, why can't Kamala have hers? Clouds Passing 9 hrs ago #146
It costs millions of dollars for recounts is why. Hand recounts are even more expensive MichMan 9 hrs ago #148
To save our democracy! Like its not worth that!? Clouds Passing 9 hrs ago #150
You need to call the Harris campaign and tell them you are paying for all of it n/t MichMan 8 hrs ago #153
Why such hate MichMan? Clouds Passing 8 hrs ago #154
Because recounts are very expensive and at best only change a few hundred or so votes MichMan 8 hrs ago #155
Great reason to hate Clouds Passing 8 hrs ago #156
Informational Warfare JR11 9 hrs ago #147
I'm all for a recount ... Jeebo 8 hrs ago #151
I agree I took a coding class years ago and this computer tabulation stinks kimbutgar 8 hrs ago #152
Do we know these numbers are correct? garybeck 6 hrs ago #159
If it sounds like a duck... Chadarius 4 hrs ago #161
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»About Those Bullet Ballot...»Reply #15