General Discussion

Fiendish Thingy

(18,460 posts)

32. There you go, ruining a perfectly good CT with facts and logic...

Reply to onenote (Reply #14)

Mon Nov 18, 2024, 03:50 PM

14 hrs ago

And expectations of verifiable evidence.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

162 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

About Those Bullet Ballots [View all] gab13by13 15 hrs ago OP

While I would be fine with a hand count audit, your last sentence is incorrect. bearsfootball516 15 hrs ago #1

Yesterday NJCher 15 hrs ago #2

Not down ballots, you mean bullet ballots. gab13by13 15 hrs ago #4

yes NJCher 15 hrs ago #7

The heck is a bullet ballot? onetexan 2 hrs ago #162

didn't he have those numbers in his duty to warn letter? Native 14 hrs ago #28

I also heard about ballots that voted for Trump and then straight Dems. Weird. OMGWTF 14 hrs ago #33

7% of a state's total is a lot more than 2. gab13by13 15 hrs ago #5

Yes it is bearsfootball516 15 hrs ago #8

I think what I read was it only happened at that high percentage in swing states Loupe Garoue 15 hrs ago #15

Right - it is the statistical anomaly that is raising questions. RandomNumbers 10 hrs ago #128

Except it didn't happen at a higher percentage in swing states. onenote 6 hrs ago #160

I agree. And he answered his own question. Are people that stupid? Ray Bruns 15 hrs ago #17

It happens a LOT, it is called undervoting. yellowdogintexas 14 hrs ago #54

Especially Trumpers JMCKUSICK 13 hrs ago #87

Of course they exist. That's not the point. soldierant 12 hrs ago #118

Only that's all BS soandso 11 hrs ago #120

What is your background with software manipulation resulting in data errors? Forget it...... Hope22 11 hrs ago #124

I'm not into arguing soandso 10 hrs ago #131

I listened to this on Thom's show. He said Kamala was the only one who could request a recount rainy 15 hrs ago #3

Provide evidence of claims for your question Sympthsical 15 hrs ago #6

These claims are made based on available statistics Loupe Garoue 15 hrs ago #16

What available statistics? Wiz Imp 13 hrs ago #102

how about you show your work NJCher 15 hrs ago #19

A hand recount should be welcomed by all. rubbersole 15 hrs ago #20

⬆⬆⬆THIS⬆⬆⬆ Think. Again. 14 hrs ago #48

I agree JoeBydun 13 hrs ago #64

I agree. Do the hand count!!! bikes and bunnies 13 hrs ago #90

This post should be a thread of its own. Fiendish Thingy 14 hrs ago #34

It is either true or it is not true Cirsium 14 hrs ago #37

It's not true. onenote 13 hrs ago #70

Thanks Cirsium 12 hrs ago #108

It is manipulation Zeitghost 11 hrs ago #121

Desperation. TheKentuckian 9 hrs ago #143

Agreed Cirsium 9 hrs ago #144

Stephen Spoonamore has been doing this for awhile. nbsmom 6 hrs ago #158

It's not true SickOfTheOnePct 13 hrs ago #91

Very good nt Cirsium 10 hrs ago #130

How about providing the data to show that it is true? Wiz Imp 13 hrs ago #103

Sure Cirsium 12 hrs ago #109

The difference keepthemhonestO 14 hrs ago #46

The Governor of North Carolina was term limited. yellowdogintexas 13 hrs ago #63

My bad, I was thinking that was keepthemhonestO 10 hrs ago #134

NC governor was not getting "ousted" unc70 13 hrs ago #67

The governor in North Carolina was not unpopular and the repub opponent was a all out disaster onenote 12 hrs ago #111

I keep hearing about irregularities SickOfTheOnePct 12 hrs ago #112

You keepthemhonestO 10 hrs ago #135

Kinda funny you expect a poster on the web to " show your work " but the government doesn't have to questionseverything 14 hrs ago #50

At this point, I'd like the guy the poster is repeating to show his work Sympthsical 14 hrs ago #58

I actually think the letter signed by buell and experts is more convincing questionseverything 13 hrs ago #61

So why not provide the data for us to see?????????????? Wiz Imp 12 hrs ago #104

I showed my work SickOfTheOnePct 12 hrs ago #113

The government(s) Zeitghost 11 hrs ago #122

Numbers were posted, true but they were not counted by human beings questionseverything 11 hrs ago #125

We oversea them through State and Local Officials Zeitghost 10 hrs ago #133

To be clear my comments are not about the bullet ballot claim at all questionseverything 10 hrs ago #142

In 2020 the Maga raised hell over "irregularities" and "anomalies" Walleye 15 hrs ago #9

The big difference is they hand counted Georgia questionseverything 14 hrs ago #57

Correct. They went with zero evidence and turned the country and election process on its head. hadEnuf 13 hrs ago #60

I see evidence and I have questions proud patriot 15 hrs ago #10

You are not nuts, this should be a hand count because it is so close and Bluethroughu 15 hrs ago #11

Asking serious questions is good malaise 15 hrs ago #12

You are grieving, not dumb Tweedy 15 hrs ago #13

The solution is easy....count the paper ballots. Hope22 14 hrs ago #29

Have you withdrawn $45,000 from your retirement account and contributed towards a recount? MichMan 14 hrs ago #38

They keepthemhonestO 14 hrs ago #49

The money is gone. The ballots were counted. Harris lost. tritsofme 14 hrs ago #55

They keepthemhonestO 13 hrs ago #62

In states largely run by Democrats...Sometimes an election just doesn't turn out like you hope. tritsofme 13 hrs ago #78

Where did they recount. Hope22 13 hrs ago #80

None of the races are close enough. They don't just do them for fun. tritsofme 13 hrs ago #86

Yep SickOfTheOnePct 12 hrs ago #114

No but I did get 10 texts a day along with dozens of calls a day to send money to VP Harris over the last six months or Hope22 13 hrs ago #77

The bullet ballots exist Tweedy 11 hrs ago #123

How is it being determined how many "bullet ballots" were cast. This still sounds like bullshit. onenote 15 hrs ago #14

There you go, ruining a perfectly good CT with facts and logic... Fiendish Thingy 14 hrs ago #32

I know. I had the same problem in 2020 when the trumpers were making unsubstantiated claims. onenote 14 hrs ago #43

I have my own theory: Fiendish Thingy 14 hrs ago #51

Here's what I don't understand. Frank D. Lincoln 11 hrs ago #119

The implicit claim is that the number of split-ticket ballots must 0. Igel 9 hrs ago #149

Not zero Loupe Garoue 8 hrs ago #157

So, where did those Arizona and Nevada percentage numbers come from? MineralMan 15 hrs ago #18

From the publicly available Arizona and Nevada websites. onenote 14 hrs ago #53

Yes. I saw your earlier post. MineralMan 13 hrs ago #68

Thanks for the clarification. It would be nice to hear from those accepting Sponamore's claims. onenote 13 hrs ago #71

I get 2.2% for Arizona Sympthsical 13 hrs ago #73

Here's how I got my result. If my math is off, show me how and I'll correct it. onenote 13 hrs ago #79

You're right, I'm wrong Sympthsical 13 hrs ago #83

Yep. And it's not as if you have to some super genius to do so. onenote 13 hrs ago #92

In post #85 SickOfTheOnePct 13 hrs ago #88

I can't replicate any of it Sympthsical 13 hrs ago #93

It can't be replicated SickOfTheOnePct 13 hrs ago #96

That's a good question. Why don't they show us the numbers so we know they are real? Wiz Imp 12 hrs ago #106

That's not what Occam's Razor says SCantiGOP 15 hrs ago #21

Stupid. Straw Man 14 hrs ago #22

Many voters vote only part of the ballot. MineralMan 14 hrs ago #26

Did the guest mention SickOfTheOnePct 14 hrs ago #23

If there were any good sources for those numbers, MineralMan 14 hrs ago #24

Looking at actual numbers tells a different story SickOfTheOnePct 13 hrs ago #85

Keep posting, gab! Kid Berwyn 14 hrs ago #25

It feels like a coup because we lost HereForTheParty 14 hrs ago #41

No, it's because the GOP steals elections. Kid Berwyn 13 hrs ago #59

I'm sure Biden & Kamala are aware of the Bullet Ballots numbers KS Toronado 14 hrs ago #27

You have misquoted Mr. Occam: Fiendish Thingy 14 hrs ago #30

Look gab, I 100% wish what you, and these others are sayin is true. The simple fact is all we want here is PROOF bluestarone 14 hrs ago #31

No Comparison Speaks2 14 hrs ago #35

What supports this hypothesis that there was cheating. HereForTheParty 14 hrs ago #44

I know this stinks keepthemhonestO 14 hrs ago #36

Good points. Welcome to DU! Doodley 13 hrs ago #66

Was keepthemhonestO 10 hrs ago #140

And how smart would it be of these devious hackers to not add votes in races that would help Trump? EdmondDantes_ 14 hrs ago #39

Hand counts will be coming Viz 14 hrs ago #40

It's not a hand recount MichMan 12 hrs ago #116

Yes I agree.... Viz 14 hrs ago #42

How are they linked to fake ballots? HereForTheParty 10 hrs ago #132

K&R Think. Again. 14 hrs ago #45

A friend of mine was a poll watcher in Grand Rapids... Orange Buffoon 14 hrs ago #47

A pole watcher isn't directly watching how people are voting, right oldmanlynn 14 hrs ago #56

They are not allowed to encroach on the voter's space. yellowdogintexas 13 hrs ago #65

I think she came to that conclusion judging by the minimal time they spent Orange Buffoon 13 hrs ago #84

If Trump and the Republicans did cheat in this way oldmanlynn 14 hrs ago #52

Agreed. Should be investigated. I remain coninced that no way did trump win every swing state legitimately. brush 13 hrs ago #69

Why should it raise eyebrows? SickOfTheOnePct 12 hrs ago #115

It's not that complicated. The battleground states are where the deciding Electoral College votes are. brush 10 hrs ago #129

A hand count is not unreasonable wryter2000 13 hrs ago #72

Who is going to pay for it? MichMan 12 hrs ago #117

I don't understand what you think this hand count is supposed to do. Dr. Strange 13 hrs ago #74

Exactly SickOfTheOnePct 13 hrs ago #94

Bullet ballots aren't illegal FakeNoose 13 hrs ago #75

Thank-you! Harris MUST take this seriously - everything is on the line! polichick 13 hrs ago #76

On your side all the way! ananda 13 hrs ago #81

the problem with your argument Oliver Bolliver Butt 13 hrs ago #82

Some numbers soandso 13 hrs ago #89

I see different numbers on Daily Kos article MadameButterfly 10 hrs ago #139

I would go with Decision Desk soandso 10 hrs ago #141

B T W Mr.Bee 13 hrs ago #95

It's ridiculous SickOfTheOnePct 13 hrs ago #97

I brought that up soandso 13 hrs ago #100

It's because we changed to mail Sympthsical 12 hrs ago #107

Are the permitted to start processing them prior to election day? SickOfTheOnePct 12 hrs ago #110

I don't trust anything that MAY be associated with the con man LilElf70 13 hrs ago #98

Steven Spoonamore on The Thom Hartmann Program Live (11/18/2024) - 02:16:30 - 02:28:45 ConcernedCitizen1776 13 hrs ago #99

Thom Hartmann Live - Spoonamore interview - 11/18/2024 ultralite001 13 hrs ago #101

In Nevada in 2020, the total votes for House Reps was 96.5% of the votes for President; in 2024, 96.1% muriel_volestrangler 12 hrs ago #105

Kinda undercut your argument with that last sentence... krkaufman 11 hrs ago #126

K&R SheltieLover 10 hrs ago #127

Building computer hardware is an entirely Progressive dog 10 hrs ago #136

bullet ballots are bs - they fucking made it too rig to big alright - the biggest rig of all time. Nimble_Idea 10 hrs ago #137

As an election judge in a county that went 82% trump... in 2020 hurple 10 hrs ago #138

Critical JR11 9 hrs ago #145

Whats the harm of doing a hand recount in the swing states. Dump got his, why can't Kamala have hers? Clouds Passing 9 hrs ago #146

It costs millions of dollars for recounts is why. Hand recounts are even more expensive MichMan 9 hrs ago #148

To save our democracy! Like its not worth that!? Clouds Passing 9 hrs ago #150

You need to call the Harris campaign and tell them you are paying for all of it n/t MichMan 8 hrs ago #153

Why such hate MichMan? Clouds Passing 8 hrs ago #154

Because recounts are very expensive and at best only change a few hundred or so votes MichMan 8 hrs ago #155

Great reason to hate Clouds Passing 8 hrs ago #156

Informational Warfare JR11 9 hrs ago #147

I'm all for a recount ... Jeebo 8 hrs ago #151

I agree I took a coding class years ago and this computer tabulation stinks kimbutgar 8 hrs ago #152

Do we know these numbers are correct? garybeck 6 hrs ago #159

If it sounds like a duck... Chadarius 5 hrs ago #161