General Discussion

soandso

(1,108 posts)

66. The numbers I posted are those posted by the states

Reply to SnoopDog (Reply #53)

Mon Nov 18, 2024, 07:40 PM

11 hrs ago

Nobody has to be a mathematician or election specialist to look at what's posted online.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

105 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The so-called "bullet ballots" and too many voting for president only [View all] soandso 12 hrs ago OP

Was just about to ask you in the other thread to make this an OP Sympthsical 12 hrs ago #1

I hope it adds a bit of clarity soandso 12 hrs ago #2

What does that even mean? Define %age difference, I don't know what you're talking about. bucolic_frolic 12 hrs ago #3

The percentage difference between soandso 12 hrs ago #5

It's the percentage of votes cast in the presidential race in excess of the votes cast in the Senate race onenote 12 hrs ago #7

And what this reveals soandso 11 hrs ago #25

Yep. There are lots of low information voters who simply choose not to vote in a race they probably don't know onenote 11 hrs ago #63

I'm good with that soandso 10 hrs ago #76

Thanks, but don't expect 2024 "election deniers" to accept facts. Silent Type 12 hrs ago #4

The scare quotes should be dropped. Igel 11 hrs ago #48

So you mean the spoon guy is full of crap? Who could have guessed? tritsofme 12 hrs ago #6

IIRC, he was claiming software was hacked soandso 12 hrs ago #8

He has made lots of baseless claims, I'll give you that. tritsofme 12 hrs ago #10

It's up to the people peddling this crap to show back up HereForTheParty 12 hrs ago #11

This guy? JanMichael 10 hrs ago #75

thank you for posting this. Takket 12 hrs ago #9

My pleasure soandso 12 hrs ago #19

Not the same ERW 10 hrs ago #83

first post huh? funny all these low post count numbers trying to whip up DU into an election conspiracy frenzy Takket 9 hrs ago #93

Your analysis is just meaningless numbers... SnoopDog 12 hrs ago #12

If a bullet ballot SickOfTheOnePct 12 hrs ago #15

How about the House votes? SnoopDog 11 hrs ago #51

It doesn't matter SickOfTheOnePct 11 hrs ago #56

Well, the Senate race in PA was important too SnoopDog 10 hrs ago #68

You don't seem to understand what a "bullet ballot" is. onenote 10 hrs ago #78

Right...bad guys would think to themselves... SnoopDog 10 hrs ago #80

So why didn't they steal the Senate races in Arizona and Wisconsin too? tritsofme 9 hrs ago #86

The guy pushing the conspiracy theory that the race was stolen is using that definition EdmondDantes_ 9 hrs ago #87

Spoonamore provided the definition: onenote 9 hrs ago #91

By definition, a so called "bullet ballot" does not include... reACTIONary 10 hrs ago #79

See above post 80... SnoopDog 10 hrs ago #81

Your post 80 is exactly right, which means... reACTIONary 9 hrs ago #94

Concerning serious reflection and analysis.... reACTIONary 9 hrs ago #96

Thank you for the article! n/t Ms. Toad 5 hrs ago #103

Yeah, how about those soandso 11 hrs ago #61

lol, right...These are actual numbers, unlike the Spoon guy's make-believe numbers. tritsofme 12 hrs ago #16

lol soandso 12 hrs ago #21

Are you a mathematician? An election specialist? Statistician? SnoopDog 11 hrs ago #53

The numbers I posted are those posted by the states soandso 11 hrs ago #66

I'm not, but let me ask you this... do you think the DNC employs such people? Takket 9 hrs ago #84

I don't know.... Does the Democractic Party have any leadership? SnoopDog 9 hrs ago #90

Yeah, it's crazy that some swing states showed as much as 5% and 7% of "President Only" ballots.. Think. Again. 12 hrs ago #13

The numbers provided in the OP SickOfTheOnePct 12 hrs ago #14

Oddly enough... Think. Again. 11 hrs ago #26

But Spoonamore says it's 7% in Arizona SickOfTheOnePct 11 hrs ago #35

Lake is the only red Senate candidate on the ballot. Think. Again. 11 hrs ago #42

I'm not sure why you think that matters in any way? Not everyone votes a straight ticket. tritsofme 11 hrs ago #45

Exactly SickOfTheOnePct 11 hrs ago #47

maybe Kari Lake should be the one asking for a recount then LOL Takket 9 hrs ago #88

All this means is that a bunch of Trump voters also voted for Gallego. tritsofme 11 hrs ago #38

All that shows is that people split tickets soandso 11 hrs ago #41

And neither do you. Think. Again. 11 hrs ago #43

I never made any claim that necessitated access to ballots soandso 11 hrs ago #49

This just demonstrates split tickets Abnredleg 11 hrs ago #44

States prevent split ballots? Igel 11 hrs ago #50

lol...wow. There's no evidence to support the claim, but here's some guy who called into a radio show. tritsofme 12 hrs ago #18

Post removed Post removed 11 hrs ago #27

There is certainly a group of folks who are eager to be scammed tritsofme 11 hrs ago #29

Feel free to check my math in post # 26 Think. Again. 11 hrs ago #31

Your math in post #26 has nothing to do with the claim that there was an inordinate number of bullet ballots. onenote 9 hrs ago #85

But remember: " His number estimates aren't important" muriel_volestrangler 12 hrs ago #23

How about instead of relying on somebody else soandso 12 hrs ago #24

See post #26 Think. Again. 11 hrs ago #33

Actual numbers just aren't backing the claim. paleotn 11 hrs ago #65

And after viewing the interview again... Think. Again. 10 hrs ago #69

There's a dozen ways to slice and dice the data, but no smoking gun so far. paleotn 10 hrs ago #72

How are we supposed to avoid the emotions of the election results if we can't claim the results are fraudulent? Fiendish Thingy 12 hrs ago #17

It's this OP that is wrong, they used the numbers from both Dem and red ballots together. Think. Again. 11 hrs ago #32

The bullet ballots are the reason we won so many close Gov. Senate and House races Fiendish Thingy 12 hrs ago #20

Exactly right soandso 12 hrs ago #22

I'd say over 9% is a big excess of bullet ballots (see post # 26). Think. Again. 11 hrs ago #30

It would be SickOfTheOnePct 11 hrs ago #39

I saw your post and addressed it soandso 11 hrs ago #46

You do realize that our lack of the actual ballots... Think. Again. 11 hrs ago #52

You don't need to see the ballots SickOfTheOnePct 11 hrs ago #58

Explain what those numbers mean please? Think. Again. 11 hrs ago #60

What position? soandso 11 hrs ago #64

close races don't need huge numbers ERW 9 hrs ago #89

True enough soandso 9 hrs ago #97

Hi, you used numbers from both Dem and red ballots... Think. Again. 11 hrs ago #28

Show your work soandso 11 hrs ago #34

See post # 26 Think. Again. 11 hrs ago #36

No you didn't Zeitghost 6 hrs ago #100

Nope SickOfTheOnePct 11 hrs ago #37

Lake was the only red Senate candidate on the ballot. Think. Again. 11 hrs ago #40

So what? SickOfTheOnePct 11 hrs ago #54

And many republicans didn't like her and voted for the democratic jimfields33 11 hrs ago #55

And then how did the green Senate candidate end up with over 50k more than stein? Think. Again. 11 hrs ago #59

Many voters think the environment is priority jimfields33 11 hrs ago #62

So you think some trump voters also voted for the green senate candidate? Think. Again. 10 hrs ago #70

People splitting tickets differently than you think they should have is not evidence of fraud. tritsofme 10 hrs ago #71

Actually, I may be heading that way... Think. Again. 10 hrs ago #74

No. jimfields33 9 hrs ago #92

Because there will have been people who voted Trump for president, and Quintana (Green) for senator muriel_volestrangler 2 hrs ago #104

I don't think that's the claim at all. Igel 11 hrs ago #57

So (please correct me if I'm wrong)... Think. Again. 11 hrs ago #67

Yes wanderer54 2 hrs ago #105

Good job Cirsium 10 hrs ago #73

It's not the right soandso 10 hrs ago #77

yes, understood Cirsium 10 hrs ago #82

I don't know why they would would soandso 9 hrs ago #95

Well, that is depressing Cirsium 6 hrs ago #101

What's depressing? soandso 5 hrs ago #102

Paper ballot judge, here Maeve 9 hrs ago #98

Jeez soandso 7 hrs ago #99