Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

LetMyPeopleVote

(181,598 posts)
Thu Apr 30, 2026, 08:59 PM Apr 30

MaddowBlog-The problem(s) with Team Trump's new price tag for the war with Iran [View all]

The Pentagon finally answered the question about the financial cost of the Iran war. But is the estimate believable?

The good news is that the Pentagon, after two months of avoiding the question, finally shared a price tag for the war in Iran.

The bad news is that the administration’s figure is very hard to believe.
www.ms.now/rachel-maddo...

Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2026-04-30T21:29:19.627Z

https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/the-problems-with-team-trumps-new-price-tag-for-the-war-in-iran

The list of questions surrounding the war with Iran is not short, but one of the nagging lines of inquiry involves its price tag: What exactly is this war of choice costing American taxpayers?....

More than two months after Donald Trump approved the military offensive, the Republican administration finally gave the public a dollar amount. MS NOW reported, as part of Wednesday’s live blog coverage:

Jules Hurst III, the chief financial officer of the Defense Department, said Trump’s war on Iran has cost the United States “about $25 billion” so far, most of which has been spent on munitions.

Hurst said the Pentagon will submit a supplemental funding request to Congress “once we have the full assessment of the cost of the conflict
.”


.....A related question, meanwhile, hangs overhead: Is $25 billion a reliable figure, especially given the early daily estimates?

MS NOW’s Chris Hayes noted during Wednesday’s hearing that it seems “a near-certainty” that the estimate “is way, way too low.”

Soon after, a CNN report based on three sources noted that the $25 billion estimate “is a lowball figure that does not include the cost of repairing extensive damage suffered by US bases in the region.”

During the hearing, Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna of California voiced skepticism of the stated price tag, calling the estimate “totally off.” Put another way, it’s probably best to take the $25 billion figure with a grain of salt as the debate continues.
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»MaddowBlog-The problem(s)...