Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

muriel_volestrangler

(106,510 posts)

6. Did the lower court's decision restrict all access via mail, or just mail to states with anti-abortion laws?

Reply to riversedge (Original post)

Mon May 4, 2026, 02:37 PM

Monday

If the former, I'm not surprised they would cancel that - people in states that are happy for mifepristone to be available via mail, or in pharmacies, would be suffering "irreparable harm". If the latter, it would be an indication that some of the conservative SC are at least going to hear arguments that access could be restored.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

(AP) -- Supreme Court restores access to abortion pill mifepristone through telehealth, mail and pharmacies. [View all] riversedge Monday OP

The Extreme Court? Aristus Monday #1

Temperary order while they consider case Boo1 Monday #2

Was this a case they reached down and snatched for their rocket docket tonkatoy8888 Monday #3

They haven't decided. onenote Monday #4

Maybe they did this out of concern that another court would issue the same ruling on viagra Buckeyeblue Monday #5

Did the lower court's decision restrict all access via mail, or just mail to states with anti-abortion laws? muriel_volestrangler Monday #6

I think the answer to me question is "all access via mail" muriel_volestrangler Monday #7