Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

karynnj

(61,073 posts)
9. Interesting comments
Wed May 6, 2026, 10:17 AM
23 hrs ago

I wonder if the unintended consequence of gerrymandering to the fullest extent might be that it eliminates the very homogeneous districts that have allowed extreme candidates to not just win, but then be in safe seats.

To get all the seats, they might have to water down 60 percent or more districts to possibly, say 52/48 percent districts. The historical trend toward seats being solidly one way has led to the election of more highly partisan people. If this reverses that, could it favor people who are more centrist?

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The GOP's gerrymandering,...»Reply #9