Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

fujiyamasan

(2,198 posts)
3. It was bound to be included in VTI at some point so that's not really concerning
Mon Jun 29, 2026, 02:31 AM
23 hrs ago

Just to give an idea VTI “relies on market-cap weighting to passively track the CRSP US Total Market Index. It includes essentially all investable U.S. equities (large, mid, small, and micro-cap stocks) without subjective committee selection”

It includes 3,484 holdings basically comprising much of the US market. It’s a passive index fund so there’s no forced inclusion here.

What’s more concerning is the fast track for the Nasdaq 100 tracked by the popular ETF QQQ. It’s heavily tech based, but has had strong performances over the decades, but it also more volatile than say the S&P500. On the plus side, S and P declined its own profitability standards to fast track SpaceX inclusion.



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»SpaceX just landed in mil...»Reply #3