Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(155,889 posts)
Wed May 14, 2025, 10:49 AM May 14

U.S. to spend $1 trillion on nuclear weapons over next decade [View all]

Source: Axios

5 hours ago


It's going to cost nearly $1 trillion to operate, maintain and upgrade America's nuclear arsenal over the next decade — more per year ($95 billion) than what's spent on many federal agencies.

Why it matters: That eye-popping estimate from the Congressional Budget Office is catnip for critics, who argue Washington is spending blindly or that portions of the triad are vestigial.

Driving the news: The combined 2025-34 nuke plans of the Defense and Energy departments amount to $946 billion.

  • In what have been a few wild days for the nuke-watching world — including India-Pakistan clashes and the U.S. Air Force saying it needs new silos for its already delayed and over-budget Sentinel missiles — the dollar figures jump out.


  • What they're saying: "The huge expenses tallied in this report were not anticipated at the outset of the nuclear modernization program," said Greg Mello, the director of Los Alamos Study Group, which monitors National Nuclear Security Administration sites and activities.

  • "There will be no return to the 'heroic mode of production' for nuclear weapons," he added.
  • "Even if Congress dumped $100 or $200 billion more on nuclear weapons, the system that produces them would not 'jump to the task' for years, if at all."


  • Read more: https://www.axios.com/2025/05/14/nuke-spending-cbo-report-criticism



    Cut a trillion for services that help keep people alive and healthy in order to pay for things that kill people.
    24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
    Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
    Who gets rich on an arms build up? Irish_Dem May 14 #1
    correct me if wrong but the USA is the largest producer of weapons! NOT good IMHO. ;; riversedge May 14 #3
    George Carlin said it best: Initech May 14 #7
    A national treasure gone far too soon. MarineCombatEngineer May 14 #12
    Yes the US military industrial complex. Irish_Dem May 14 #17
    People/Corporations who give loads of "free speech" to all two parties. (n/t) DJ Synikus Makisimus May 14 #18
    No thank you. I prefer my Medicare and Social Security. no_hypocrisy May 14 #2
    I'm surprised it's only $100 Billion a year, unfortunately. Silent Type May 14 #4
    Considering how old much of our nuclear weapons and delivery systems are, I'm surprised its not higher DetroitLegalBeagle May 14 #5
    We got no money to keep the government open, but plenty to blow shit up! Initech May 14 #6
    Two questions: where will this money come from... ananda May 14 #8
    Looks like the national lab in Los Alamos womanofthehills May 15 #21
    How come nobody mentioned that Eloon is in nuclear weapons business? Wonder Why May 14 #9
    How exactly? EX500rider May 14 #15
    Some people just positively, absolutely need this: Wonder Why May 15 #19
    Don't really read sig lines....and: EX500rider May 15 #22
    Probably not the warheads themselves but highly likely involved in the delivery systems. harun May 16 #23
    I doubt they care about the landing ability of the Starship as icbms are on a one-way trip EX500rider May 16 #24
    and they don't make me feel, well, safer. twodogsbarking May 14 #10
    I went to grade school in the old "duck and cover" days but in Junior High School elocs May 14 #11
    Well... as long as we're spending it on something really, REALLY useful for once... Montauk6 May 14 #13
    Primarily maintenance - minimal upgrades. NoMoreRepugs May 14 #14
    We already have enough to end humanity 300 times over or some shit. What, are extraterrestrials invading? Karasu May 14 #16
    The older the ICBM's get, the less reliable they get, and maintenance gets harder & more expensive with obsolete parts EX500rider May 15 #20
    Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. to spend $1 trillion...