Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

EX500rider

(11,914 posts)
22. Don't really read sig lines....and:
Thu May 15, 2025, 07:24 PM
May 15

....and I've seen people here who were serious that we might blow up the moon and another who thought North Korea must be a workers paradise because "They look so happy in the pictures!" (started reading DU daily in 2005, didn't sign up till years later)

So yes, you might need the sarcasm emoji.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Who gets rich on an arms build up? Irish_Dem May 14 #1
correct me if wrong but the USA is the largest producer of weapons! NOT good IMHO. ;; riversedge May 14 #3
George Carlin said it best: Initech May 14 #7
A national treasure gone far too soon. MarineCombatEngineer May 14 #12
Yes the US military industrial complex. Irish_Dem May 14 #17
People/Corporations who give loads of "free speech" to all two parties. (n/t) DJ Synikus Makisimus May 14 #18
No thank you. I prefer my Medicare and Social Security. no_hypocrisy May 14 #2
I'm surprised it's only $100 Billion a year, unfortunately. Silent Type May 14 #4
Considering how old much of our nuclear weapons and delivery systems are, I'm surprised its not higher DetroitLegalBeagle May 14 #5
We got no money to keep the government open, but plenty to blow shit up! Initech May 14 #6
Two questions: where will this money come from... ananda May 14 #8
Looks like the national lab in Los Alamos womanofthehills May 15 #21
How come nobody mentioned that Eloon is in nuclear weapons business? Wonder Why May 14 #9
How exactly? EX500rider May 14 #15
Some people just positively, absolutely need this: Wonder Why May 15 #19
Don't really read sig lines....and: EX500rider May 15 #22
Probably not the warheads themselves but highly likely involved in the delivery systems. harun May 16 #23
I doubt they care about the landing ability of the Starship as icbms are on a one-way trip EX500rider May 16 #24
and they don't make me feel, well, safer. twodogsbarking May 14 #10
I went to grade school in the old "duck and cover" days but in Junior High School elocs May 14 #11
Well... as long as we're spending it on something really, REALLY useful for once... Montauk6 May 14 #13
Primarily maintenance - minimal upgrades. NoMoreRepugs May 14 #14
We already have enough to end humanity 300 times over or some shit. What, are extraterrestrials invading? Karasu May 14 #16
The older the ICBM's get, the less reliable they get, and maintenance gets harder & more expensive with obsolete parts EX500rider May 15 #20
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. to spend $1 trillion...»Reply #22